ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2022
The comparison of inflammatory markers in geriatric and nongeriatric endometrial cancers.
Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Predictive Role of Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio (NPAR) in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Novel Prognostic Marker.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Preoperative Haematologic Markers for the Differentiation of Endometrial Cancer from Benign Endometrial Lesions in Postmenopausal Patients with Endometrial Masses.Cancer management and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe inflammatory markers are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in endometrial cancers (EC), but hematopoietic aging may affect the results.
objectiveTo compare inflammatory markers in geriatric and nongeriatric EC.
methodsThis study included 342 women with endometrial cancers (n: 171) and age-matched controls (n: 171). Geriatric (⩾ 65 years old) and nongeriatric women in each group was compared for inflammatory markers, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW).
resultsGeriatric EC had more common nonendometrioid tumors, myometrial invasion, lymph node metastasis, advanced stage, and low overall survival (OS). Nongeriatric EC had low MPV, high NLR, and PDW compared to nongeriatric control. Geriatric EC had low MPV, lymphocyte, and high NLR, PLR compared to geriatric control (p< 0.05). Geriatric EC had significantly low PDW and high NLR, PLR compared to nongeriatric EC in early stages, not in advanced stages. Lymphocyte count was significantly low in geriatric EC with all stages (p< 0.05). In nongeriatric EC, stage was related to platelet count (r: 0.341, p: 0.0019), and PLR (r: 0.252, p: 0.01). OS was negatively related to PLR (r: -0.267, p: 0.007) and NLR (r: -0.353, p: 0.000). In geriatric EC, myometrium invasion was negatively related to lymphocyte count (r: -0.268, p: 0.035). OS was related to neutrophil count (p: 0.352, p: 0.01). MPV was negatively related to stage (r: -0.335, p: 0.01) and OS (r: -0.337, p: 0.02).
conclusionsThe inflammatory responses of geriatric and nongeriatric EC were different in the early and advanced stages. Geriatric EC had low PDW and high NLR, PLR compared to nongeriatric EC in early stages. Decreased lymphocyte count was the most prominent feature of geriatric EC in the early and advanced stages. These results suggested that decreased lymphocyte count may reflect an aggressive course of disease in the elderlies. Future inflammation studies may direct anticancer treatment strategies in geriatric EC. Further research on inflammaging and geriatric EC is needed to increase our understanding of aging and carcinogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.