Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35431191›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2022

The association of disability status with job tenure for U.S. workers.

Debra L Brucker, Megan Henly, Marisa Rafal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the working conditions of disabled employees: a scoping review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debra L BruckerInstitute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Megan HenlyInstitute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Marisa RafalInstitute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90RT5037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJob tenure is a useful economic indicator. To employees, longer job tenure creates higher rewards in pay, promotion opportunities, and job security. For employers, there are fewer costs in recruitment and retraining when job turnover is low. Marginalized populations, such as persons with disabilities, may find work in various economies, but retention is more difficult. They are often the first to be laid off in struggling economies.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to highlight differences in individual and employment-related factors associated with job tenure for American workers with and without disabilities.

methodsUsing newly available survey data (N = 1,538), OLS regression is used to estimate job tenure for workers with and without disabilities, controlling for worker sociodemographic characteristics, a job quality index, and job characteristics. All disability types are examined.

resultsMultivariate results show that workers with disabilities have shorter job tenure than others when controlling for job quality, individual characteristics and job characteristics.

conclusionEmployees with disabilities have shorter job tenure than those without. Given the benefits of lengthened job tenure, further efforts should be made to explore this issue and to develop effective strategies that help those with disabilities retain jobs long term.

Indexed as

OccupationsPersons with DisabilitiesEmploymentHumansJob DescriptionJob SatisfactionPersonnel TurnoverUnited StatesDisabilitiesemploymentjob qualitypersons with disabilitieswork satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID35431191
PMCPMC13573171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.