Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35430902›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology2023

Validating the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in a Cognitive Clinic: Comparisons With the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire.

Sophie Hu, Scott Patten, Anna Charlton, Karyn Fischer, Gordon Fick, Eric E Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie HuDepartment of Community Health Sciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Scott PattenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Anna CharltonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Karyn FischerHotchkiss Brain Institute, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Gordon FickDepartment of Community Health Sciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Eric E SmithDepartment of Community Health Sciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailDepartment of Community Health Sciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5529-3731

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the utility of the Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) to capture NPS in subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia.

methodsIn this cross-sectional memory clinic study, linear regression models compared MBI-C (n = 474) and NPI-Q (n = 1040) scores in relation to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score.

resultsMBI prevalence was 37% in subjective cognitive decline, 54% in mild cognitive impairment, and 62% in dementia. Worse diagnostic status was associated with higher MBI-C and NPI-Q score (

conclusionsThe MBI-C captures global and domain-specific NPS across cognitive stages. Both the MBI-C and NPI-Q have utility in characterizing NPS.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaChecklistCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNeuropsychological TestsSurveys and QuestionnairesAlzheimer’s diseasebehaviorcognitive declinemild cognitive impairmentneuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID35430902
PMCPMC9941652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.