ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022
A geometric relationship of
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Spatiotemporal fluctuations of population structure in the Americas revealed by a meta-analysis of the first decade of archaeogenomes.American journal of biological anthropology · 2023Pooled it
- Mixtum: a graphical tool for two-way admixture analysis in population genetics based on f-statistics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Three open questions in polygenic score portability.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Coalescent theory of the ψ directionality index.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- randPedPCA: rapid approximation of principal components from large pedigrees.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- A probabilistic approach to visualize the effect of missing data on PCA in ancient human genomics.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Performance of qpAdm-based screens for genetic admixture on graph-shaped histories and stepping stone landscapes.Genetics · 2025Article
- Leveraging Whole Genomes, Mitochondrial DNA and Haploblocks to Decipher Complex Demographic Histories: An Example From a Broadly Admixed Arctic Fish.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- PANE: fast and reliable ancestral reconstruction on ancient genotype data with non-negative least square and principal component analysis.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Testing times: disentangling admixture histories in recent and complex demographies using ancient DNA.Genetics · 2024Article
- Genomic analyses correspond with deep persistence of peoples of Blackfoot Confederacy from glacial times.Science advances · 2024Article
- Testing Times: Challenges in Disentangling Admixture Histories in Recent and Complex Demographies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Modeling of African population history using f-statistics is biased when applying all previously proposed SNP ascertainment schemes.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Ancient dolphin genomes reveal rapid repeated adaptation to coastal waters.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A genetic and linguistic analysis of the admixture histories of the islands of Cabo Verde.eLife · 2023Article
- Celebrating 50 years since Lewontin's apportionment of human diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- A geometric relationship ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Principal component analysis (PCA) and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.