ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022
The apportionment of citations: a scientometric analysis of Lewontin 1972.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increasing equity in science requires better ethics training: A course by trainees, for trainees.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Typological thinking in human genomics research contributes to the production and prominence of scientific racism.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- The background and legacy of Lewontin's apportionment of human genetic diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Review
- How HLA diversity is apportioned: influence of selection and relevance to transplantation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Celebrating 50 years since Lewontin's apportionment of human diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
'The apportionment of human diversity' (1972) is the most highly cited research article published by geneticist Richard Lewontin in his career. This study's primary result-that most genetic diversity in humans can be accounted for by within-population differences, not between-population differences-along with Lewontin's outspoken, politically charged interpretations thereof, has become foundational to the scientific and cultural discourse pertaining to human genetic variation. The article has an unusual bibliometric trajectory in that it is much more salient in the bibliographic record today compared to the first 20 years after its publication. Here, we highlight four factors that may have played a role in shaping the paper's fame: (i) citations in influential publications across several disciplines; (ii) Lewontin's own popular books and media appearances; (iii) the renaissance of population genetics research of the early 1990s; and (iv) the serendipitous collision of scientific progress, influential books and papers, and heated controversies around the year 1994. We conclude with an analysis of Twitter data to characterize the communities and conversations that continue to keep this study at the centre of discussions about race and genetics, prompting new challenges for scientists who have inherited Lewontin's legacy. This article is part of the theme issue 'Celebrating 50 years since Lewontin's apportionment of human diversity'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.