ReviewDermatology and therapy2022
The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hospitalist-performed skin biopsy in the diagnosis of skin disease.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNon-dermatology medical specialties may refer patients for skin biopsies, searching for a particular diagnosis. However, the diagnostic impact of the skin biopsy is not clearly established. This article aims to assess the indications for, and evaluate the clinical relevance of, skin biopsies in non-dermatology medical specialties.
methodsA questionnaire was sent to 23 non-dermatology specialty departments in a university medical center, requesting a list of indications for skin biopsies, as well as to 10 staff dermatologists to collect the indications of skin biopsies requested by non-dermatology specialties. Once the indications were collected, a literature search was performed to evaluate their clinical value and relevance.
resultsEleven non-dermatology specialties provided a list of skin biopsy indications, to which staff dermatologists added seven more indications. A literature search revealed evidence-based medicine data for six diseases, that is, amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon's syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Results were questionable concerning infectious endocarditis, acute graft-versus-host-disease, and the lupus band test. Skin biopsy were not evidenced as useful for the diagnosis of calciphylaxis, systemic scleroderma, Behçet's disease, or hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. For the diagnosis of Alport's syndrome, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, skin biopsy is currently outperformed by genetic analyses. For diagnoses such as Henoch-Schönlein purpura and Sjögren's syndrome, skin biopsy represents an additional item among other diagnostic criteria.
conclusionThe usefulness of skin biopsy as requested by non-dermatology specialties is only evidenced for amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon's syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, chronic graft-versus-host-disease, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, and Sjögren's syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.