SynthesisDysphagia2022
The Effectiveness of Transcranial Stimulation in Improving Swallowing Outcomes in Adults with Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with different stimulation parameters on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Global research trends in transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke (1994-2023): promising, yet requiring further practice.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Advances in stroke-associated pneumonia in the era of revascularization therapy.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Article
- The effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia in stroke patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
- Perspective on the clinical management of post-stroke aphasia and dysphagia using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Effect of acupuncture therapy for postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in gastric and colorectal cancers: an umbrella review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Post-stroke Dysphagia Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review of Meta-analyses in 2022.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial stimulation has been proposed as an alternative rehabilitation therapy for adults with post-stroke dysphagia (PSD). This systematic review sought to determine the effectiveness of transcranial stimulation in patients with post-stroke dysphagia to improve swallowing function. From inception to January 3, 2021, an extensive search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Scopus, Web of Science. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included studies in adults aged 18 years and older who suffered from post-stroke dysphagia. Using Hedges' g as effect size, meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. To investigate potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses, and multivariable meta-regression analyses were conducted. Sixteen RCTs were included in this review, and 13 RCTs were used for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that a large effect size in improving swallowing function after repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (g = - 0.86, 95% CI - 1.57, - 0.16) and medium effect size in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (g = - 0.61, 95% CI - 1.04, - 0.17) at post-intervention, respectively. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis indicated that stimulation of the esophagus cortical area and middle-aged adults had a greater effect on swallowing function. The overall certainty of evidence assessed using the GRADE approach was low. Despite the positive results, transcranial stimulation requires additional research to reach definitive conclusions about the optimal stimulation protocol and to achieve the greatest benefit. Future trials should be more rigorous and include a larger sample size to demonstrate the efficacy of transcranial stimulation. Transcranial stimulation enables a more efficacious approach to dysphagia mitigation in PSD rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.