Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35430613›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2022

The complex karyotype in hematological malignancies: a comprehensive overview by the Francophone Group of Hematological Cytogenetics (GFCH).

F Nguyen-Khac, A Bidet, A Daudignon, M Lafage-Pochitaloff, G Ameye, C Bilhou-Nabéra, E Chapiro, M A Collonge-Rame, W Cuccuini, N Douet-Guilbert and 10 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

F Nguyen-KhacCell Death and Drug Resistance in Lymphoproliferative Disorders Team, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM UMRS 1138, Paris, France. florence.nguyen-khac@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-6668
A BidetCHU Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Hématologie Biologique, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
A DaudignonInstitut de Génétique Médicale - Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre - CHRU de Lille, Lille, France.
M Lafage-PochitaloffLaboratoire de Cytogénétique Hématologique, Hôpital Timone Enfant, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
G AmeyeCenter for Human Genetics, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5838-2879
C Bilhou-NabéraService d'Hématologie Biologique, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
E ChapiroCell Death and Drug Resistance in Lymphoproliferative Disorders Team, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM UMRS 1138, Paris, France.
M A Collonge-RameService de Génétique Biologique-Histologie, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
W CuccuiniLaboratoire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France.
N Douet-GuilbertUniv Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France.
V EclacheLaboratoire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, Bobigny, France.
I LuquetLaboratoire d'Hématologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
L MichauxCenter for Human Genetics, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
N NadalService de génétique chromosomique et moléculaire, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
D PentherLaboratoire de Génétique Oncologique, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
B QuilichiniDépartement Hématologie Cellulaire/Cytogénétique, Biomnis, Lyon, France.
C TerreLaboratoire de Cytogénétique, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Versailles, France.
C LefebvreLaboratoire de Génétique des Hémopathies - CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
M-B TroadecUniv Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-9670
L VéronèseEA 7453 CHELTER, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRKU Leuven · BECentre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRLaboratoire National Henri Becquerel · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karyotype complexity has major prognostic value in many malignancies. There is no consensus on the definition of a complex karyotype, and the prognostic impact of karyotype complexity differs from one disease to another. Due to the importance of the complex karyotype in the prognosis and treatment of several hematological diseases, the Francophone Group of Hematological Cytogenetics (Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique, GFCH) has developed an up-to-date, practical document for helping cytogeneticists to assess complex karyotypes in these hematological disorders. The evaluation of karyotype complexity is challenging, and it would be useful to have a consensus method for counting the number of chromosomal abnormalities (CAs). Although it is not possible to establish a single prognostic threshold for the number of CAs in all malignancies, a specific consensus prognostic cut-off must be defined for each individual disease. In order to standardize current cytogenetic practices and apply a single denomination, we suggest defining a low complex karyotype as having 3 CAs, an intermediate complex karyotype as having 4 CAs, and a highly complex karyotype as having 5 or more CAs.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsHematologyChromosome AberrationsCytogenetic AnalysisCytogeneticsHumansKaryotypePrognosisSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID35430613
OpenAlexW4224086916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.