Observational studyScientific reports2022
Observational study of rebiopsy in EGFR-TKI-resistant patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: squamous transformation after long-term osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with retained EGFR/TP53 alterations.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes of T790M Mutation Testing and Sequential Osimertinib in EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Revisited Strategy.Targeted oncology · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsy in clinical outcomes and detection of T790M mutation in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after progression to EGFR-TKI.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Article
- Monitoring of T790M in plasma ctDNA of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients on first- or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Favorable Conditions for the Detection of EGFR T790M Mutation Using Plasma Sample in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
- Factors associated with outcomes of second-line treatment forFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of acquired resistance mutations has been essential in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) active mutations. Rebiopsy plays a pivotal role in selecting the optimal treatment for patients who develop resistance to initial EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). This multicenter, observational study was conducted to investigate the details of rebiopsy in Japanese clinical practice. The primary endpoints were the implementation rate of rebiopsy and the concordance rate for T790M mutation detection between histological and cytological specimens using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test, version 2. One hundred ninety-four patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were enrolled, and 120 patients developed acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The median age was 68 years (range 20-87), and 52.5% of the patients were women. Rebiopsy was performed in 109 patients, and the implementation rate of rebiopsy was 90.8%. The success rates of rebiopsy in the total, histology, cytology and liquid biopsy populations were 67.9%, 81.3%, 66.7% and 43.8%, respectively. The positive percent agreement and the negative percent agreement in the detection of the T790M mutation between the histological and cytological specimens were both 90.9%. Obtaining histological or cytological tissue samples at rebiopsy may contribute to improving the detection rate of the T790M mutation (trial registration number: UMIN000026019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.