Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35430474›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular graphics & modelling2022

Molecular modelling identification of phytocompounds from selected African botanicals as promising therapeutics against druggable human host cell targets of SARS-CoV-2.

John Omo-Osagie Uhomoibhi, Francis Oluwole Shode, Kehinde Ademola Idowu, Saheed Sabiu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular graphics & modelling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Modeling Identification of Key Secondary Metabolites fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John Omo-Osagie UhomoibhiDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, PO Box 1334, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Francis Oluwole ShodeDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, PO Box 1334, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Kehinde Ademola IdowuDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, PO Box 1334, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Saheed SabiuDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, PO Box 1334, Durban, 4000, South Africa. Electronic address: sabius@dut.ac.za.
Durban University of Technology · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is highly pathogenic and transmissible. It is mediated by the binding of viral spike proteins to human cells via entry and replication processes involving human angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (hACE2), transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2) and cathepsin L (Cath L). The identification of novel therapeutics that can modulate viral entry or replication has been of research interest and would be germane in managing COVID-19 subjects. This study investigated the structure-activity relationship inhibitory potential of 99 phytocompounds from selected African botanicals with proven therapeutic benefits against respiratory diseases focusing on SARS-CoV-2's human cell proteins (hACE2, TMPRSS2, and Cathepsin L) as druggable targets using computational methods. Evaluation of the binding energies of the phytocompounds showed that two compounds, Abrusoside A (-63.393 kcal/mol) and Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (-58.939 kcal/mol) had stronger affinity for the exopeptidase site of hACE2 compared to the reference drug, MLN-4760 (-54.545 kcal/mol). The study further revealed that Verbascoside (-63.338 kcal/mol), Abrectorin (-37.880 kcal/mol), and Friedelin (-36.989 kcal/mol) are potential inhibitors of TMPRSS2 compared to Nafamostat (-36.186 kcal/mol), while Hemiphloin (-41.425 kcal/mol), Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (-37.257 kcal/mol), and Myricetin-3-O-galactoside (-36.342 kcal/mol) are potential inhibitors of Cathepsin L relative to Bafilomycin A1 (-38.180 kcal/mol). The structural analysis suggests that these compounds do not compromise the structural integrity of the proteins, but rather stabilized and interacted well with the active site amino acid residues critical to inhibition of the respective proteins. Overall, the findings from this study are suggestive of the structural mechanism of inhibitory action of the identified leads against the proteins critical for SARS-CoV-2 to enter the human host cell. While the study has lent credence to the significant role the compounds could play in developing potent SARS-CoV-2 candidate drugs against COVID-19, further structural refinement, and modifications of the compounds for subsequent in vitro as well as preclinical and clinical evaluations are underway.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsCathepsin LHumansMolecular Docking SimulationAntiviral AgentsCathepsin LCOVID-19Host cell targetsMolecular dynamics simulationPhytocompoundsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35430474
PMCPMC9002601
OpenAlexW4223618263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.