ArticleLeukemia research2022
Landscape of NOTCH1 mutations and co-occurring biomarker alterations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in Leukemia research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic significance of in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2025Pooled it
- Distinct Associations ofGenes · 2026Article
- Mutational Landscape and Clinical Impact of SPEN Mutations in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetic Profiling of Acute and Chronic Leukemia via Next-Generation Sequencing: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- The role of notch signaling pathway in cancer: mechanistic insights, therapeutic potential, and clinical progress.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Exploring the Multiple Roles of Notch1 in Biological Development: An Analysis and Study Based on Phylogenetics and Transcriptomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
NOTCH1 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and has emerged as a marker of poor prognosis. In addition to coding NOTCH1 mutations involving exon 34, non-coding NOTCH1 mutations involving the 3' UTR have been described in a limited number of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and were associated with adverse outcomes. In this study, 1574 CLL patients were assessed using targeted sequencing with a 29 gene panel and the results were correlated with prognostic characteristics. NOTCH1 mutations were detected in 252 (16%) patients, including both coding (220/252, 14%), non-coding (24/252, 1.5%) and a mixture of coding and non-coding (8/252, 0.5%) NOTCH1 mutations. NOTCH1 mutations were more commonly seen in patients with unmutated IGHV, ZAP70 positivity and CD38 positivity. Mixed NOTCH1 mutations were also more commonly seen in patients with unmutated IGHV and ZAP70. There was no association between mixed NOTCH1 mutations and CD38 expression in this cohort. The most common cytogenetic alteration detected in patients with coding and mixed NOTCH1 mutations was trisomy 12, whereas del13q was the most common cytogenetic alteration detected in patients with non-coding NOTCH1 mutation. The most common gene mutations co-occurring with coding NOTCH1 mutations were: TP53 (23.2%), SF3B1 (16.4%) and SPEN (10%). The most common gene mutations co-occurring with non-coding NOTCH1 mutations were: SF3B1 11(34.4%), ATM 4(12.5%) and TP53 4(12.5%). CLL patients with clonal coding and non-coding NOTCH1 mutations had a significantly shorter time-to-first treatment than patients with wild type NOTCH1 (4.3 vs 10.0 years and 0.9 vs 10.0 years respectively, p < 0.05). Similarly, CLL patients with subclonal coding NOTCH1 mutations had a significantly shorter time-to-first treatment than patients with wild type NOTCH1 (5.6 vs 10.0 years, p < 0.05). CLL patients with subclonal non-coding NOTCH1 mutations also had a shorter time-to-first treatment than patients with wild type NOTCH1 mutations, however, the difference was not significant (5.1 vs 10.0 years, p = 0.15). These data confirm that both coding and non-coding NOTCH1 mutations carry adverse prognostic impact and need to be included in sequencing assays performed for the prognostic workup of CLL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.