Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35430236›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2022

Semantic flow and its relation to controlled semantic retrieval deficits in the narrative production of people with aphasia.

Celia P Litovsky, Ann Marie Finley, Bonnie Zuckerman, Matthew Sayers, Julie A Schoenhard, Yoed N Kenett, Jamie Reilly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Celia P LitovskyEleanor M. Saffran Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: celia.litovsky@temple.edu.
Ann Marie FinleyEleanor M. Saffran Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bonnie ZuckermanEleanor M. Saffran Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew SayersEleanor M. Saffran Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Julie A SchoenhardEleanor M. Saffran Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yoed N KenettFaculty of Industrial Engineering & Management, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Jamie ReillyEleanor M. Saffran Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Temple University · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

Semantic Memory and Language Learning in Alzheimer's Disease and Semantic DementiR01DC013063 · NIDCD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI James Joseph Reilly · 2014 to 2026
$6.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aphasia has had a profound influence on our understanding of how language is instantiated within the human brain. Historically, aphasia has yielded an in vivo model for elucidating the effects of impaired lexical-semantic access on language comprehension and production. Aphasiology has focused intensively on single word dissociations. Yet, less is known about the integrity of combinatorial semantic processes required to construct well-formed narratives. Here we addressed the question of how controlled lexical-semantic retrieval deficits (a hallmark of aphasia) might compound over the course of longer narratives. We specifically examined word-by-word flow of taxonomic vs. thematic semantic distance in the storytelling narratives of individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia (n = 259) relative to age-matched controls (n = 203). We first parsed raw transcribed narratives into content words and computed inter-word semantic distances for every running pair of words in each narrative (N = 232,490 word transitions). The narratives of people with aphasia showed significant reductions in taxonomic and thematic semantic distance relative to controls. Both distance metrics were strongly predictive of offline measures of semantic impairment and aphasia severity. Since individuals with aphasia often exhibit perseverative language output (i.e., repetitions), we performed additional analyses with repetitions excluded. When repetitions were excluded, group differences in semantic distances persisted and thematic distance was still predictive of semantic impairment, although some findings changed. These results demonstrate the cumulative impact of deficits in controlled word retrieval over the course of narrative production. We discuss the nature of semantic flow between words as a novel metric of characterizing discourse and elucidating the nature of lexical-semantic access impairment in aphasia at multiword levels.

Indexed as

AphasiaSemanticsBrainHumansLanguageNarrationAphasiaSemantic distanceTaxonomic relationsThematic relations

Identifiers

PMID35430236
PMCPMC9978996
OpenAlexW4224058169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.