Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35430029›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Neurology2022

Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms.

Mark Hallett, Selma Aybek, Barbara A Dworetzky, Laura McWhirter, Jeffrey P Staab, Jon Stone

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07527403 (Impact of Theta Burst Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Patient's Self-reported Improvement in Their Motor Functional Neurological Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 224 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07527403 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Theta Burst Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Patient's Self-reported Improvement in Their Motor Functional Neurological Disorder

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Center Guillaume RégnierRan2026 to 2028Enrolled22ConditionsFunctional Neurological Disorder, Motor FNDArmstheta-burst rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Sleep disorders in functional neurological disorder - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Incidence and prevalence of functional neurological disorder: a systematic review.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pain and functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Imaging biomarkers in functional neurological disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  15. Neurofeedback for functional neurological disorders: future directions for research and clinical practice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026
    Review

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark HallettHuman Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: hallettm@ninds.nih.gov.
Selma AybekPsychosomatic Medicine Unit, Neurology Department, Bern University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Barbara A DworetzkyDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura McWhirterCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jeffrey P StaabDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, and Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jon StoneCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Pathophysiology of Involuntary Movements and Volitional DisordersZIANS002667 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLETT, MARK · 2009 to 2023
$17.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neurological disorder is common in neurological practice. A new approach to the positive diagnosis of this disorder focuses on recognisable patterns of genuinely experienced symptoms and signs that show variability within the same task and between different tasks over time. Psychological stressors are common risk factors for functional neurological disorder, but are often absent. Four entities-functional seizures, functional movement disorders, persistent perceptual postural dizziness, and functional cognitive disorder-show similarities in aetiology and pathophysiology and are variants of a disorder at the interface between neurology and psychiatry. All four entities have distinctive features and can be diagnosed with the support of clinical neurophysiological studies and other biomarkers. The pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder includes overactivity of the limbic system, the development of an internal symptom model as part of a predictive coding framework, and dysfunction of brain networks that gives movement the sense of voluntariness. Evidence supports tailored multidisciplinary treatment that can involve physical and psychological therapy approaches.

Indexed as

Conversion DisorderBrainHumansSeizures

Identifiers

PMID35430029
PMCPMC9107510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.