ReviewLancet (London, England)2022
Improved models of care for cancer survivors.
Review in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06582498 (Life S-Can), which is not on this map. Cited by 159 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Life S-Can: a Novel Clinical Tool to Effectively Assess Individual Needs in Cancer Survivorship Care and Improve Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors
Who cites it
159 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for breast cancer survivorship care: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility and preliminary effects of mhealth supportive care interventions in adults with myeloid neoplasms: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Continuity of Care Interventions Linking Hospital Care to Primary Healthcare for Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Models of survivorship care in patients with head and neck cancer in regional, rural, and remote areas: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Pooled it
- Preferences of cancer survivors for follow-up care: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Non-gastrointestinal symptom burden following colorectal cancer treatment-a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Primary care physicians' knowledge and confidence in providing cancer survivorship care: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Pooled it
- Communication and support of patients and caregivers in chronic cancer care: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline.ESMO open · 2024Guideline
- Long-Noncoding-RNA HOTAIR Upregulation is Associated with Poor Breast Cancer Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Pooled it
- Using co-design to develop actionable strategies to identify and follow-up on breast cancer survivors in primary care.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- A complex survivorship intervention utilizing electronic patient-reported outcomes in breast and gynecologic Cancer: the linking you to support and advice [LYSA] trial.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Trial
- Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Detection of colon cancer recurrences during follow-up care by general practitioners vs surgeons.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Trial
- Beyond survival: Advancing symptom science across the adolescent and young adult cancer continuum.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Receipt of Preventive Care and Health Promotion Counseling in Early Stage Breast Cancer Survivors.The Journal of surgical research · 2026Article
- Informational and structural barriers to exercise oncology care in Spain: development of the MOVE-Onco questionnaire and preliminary findings.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- The role of general practitioners in German cancer care: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- From consensus to implementation in cancer survivorship follow-up.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of survivors of cancer is increasing substantially. Current models of care are unsustainable and fail to address the many unmet needs of survivors of cancer. Numerous trials have investigated alternate models of care, including models led by primary-care providers, care shared between oncology specialists and primary-care providers, and care led by oncology nurses. These alternate models appear to be at least as effective as specialist-led care and are applicable to many survivors of cancer. Choosing the most appropriate care model for each patient depends on patient-level factors (such as risk of longer-term effects, late effects, individual desire, and capacity to self-manage), local services, and health-care policy. Wider implementation of alternative models requires appropriate support for non-oncologist care providers and endorsement of these models by cancer teams with their patients. The COVID-19 pandemic has driven some changes in practice that are more patient-centred and should continue. Improved models should shift from a predominant focus on detection of cancer recurrence and seek to improve the quality of life, functional outcomes, experience, and survival of survivors of cancer, reduce the risk of recurrence and new cancers, improve the management of comorbidities, and reduce costs to patients and payers. This Series paper focuses primarily on high-income countries, where most data have been derived. However, future research should consider the applicability of these models in a wider range of health-care settings and for a wider range of cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.