Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429898›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2022

Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds from Paederia scandens (Lour.) Merr. Using deep eutectic solvent: optimization, identification, and comparison with traditional methods.

Yuxin Liu, Wang Zhe, Ruifen Zhang, Ziting Peng, Yuxi Wang, Heqi Gao, Zhiqiang Guo, Juan Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antioxidant Activity ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Neuroprotective Mechanisms ofMarine drugs · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In Vitro Biological Activities ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuxin LiuSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University/Engineering Research Center of Utilization of Tropical polysaccharide resources, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Functional Food of Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China.
Wang ZheSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University/Engineering Research Center of Utilization of Tropical polysaccharide resources, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Functional Food of Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China.
Ruifen ZhangSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangdong Key laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou 510610, China.
Ziting PengSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University/Engineering Research Center of Utilization of Tropical polysaccharide resources, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Functional Food of Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China.
Yuxi WangSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University/Engineering Research Center of Utilization of Tropical polysaccharide resources, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Functional Food of Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China.
Heqi GaoSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University/Engineering Research Center of Utilization of Tropical polysaccharide resources, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Functional Food of Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China.
Zhiqiang GuoState Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea, School of Life Science, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Juan XiaoSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University/Engineering Research Center of Utilization of Tropical polysaccharide resources, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Functional Food of Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China. Electronic address: xiaojuan209218@163.com.
Hainan University · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) coupled with deep eutectic solvent (DES) is a novel, efficient and green extraction method for phytochemicals. In this study, the effects of 16 DESs coupled with UAE on the extraction rate of polyphenols from Paederia scandens (Lour.) Merr. (P. scandens), an edible and medicinal herb, were investigated. DES synthesised with choline chloride and ethylene glycol at a 1:2 M ratio resulted in the highest extractability. Moreover, the effects of extraction parameters were investigated by using a two-level factorial experiment followed by response surface methodology The optimal parameters (water content in DES of 49.2%, the actual ultrasonic power of 72.4 W, and ultrasonic time of 9.7 min) resulted in the optimal total flavonoid content (TFC) (27.04 mg CE/g DW), ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) value (373.27 μmol Fe(Ⅱ)E/g DW) and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid radical (ABTS

Indexed as

Deep Eutectic SolventsPolyphenolsAntioxidantsFlavonoidsPlant ExtractsSolventsUltrasonicsAntioxidantsDeep Eutectic SolventsFlavonoidsPlant ExtractsPolyphenolsSolventsAntioxidant capacityDeep eutectic solventsPaederia scandens (Lour.) Merr.PolyphenolUltrasonic-assisted extraction

Identifiers

PMID35429898
PMCPMC9035432
OpenAlexW4223632155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.