Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429731›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022

Benefits of neoadjuvant therapy compared with adjuvant chemotherapy for the survival of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study at FUSCC.

Shuyue Zheng, Lun Li, Ming Chen, Benlong Yang, Jiajian Chen, Guangyu Liu, Zhimin Shao, Jiong Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Can neoadjuvant systemic therapy provide additional benefits for T1 HER2+ breast cancer patients: a subgroup analysis based on different high-risk signatures.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuyue ZhengDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
Lun LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China; Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ming ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
Benlong YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
Jiajian ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
Guangyu LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
Zhimin ShaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
Jiong WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: wujiong1122@vip.sina.com.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is considered the standard of care for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). However, there is no proven survival benefit of NAT compared to adjuvant therapy for the survival of patients with early-stage HER2-positive BC. This study aimed to compare the prognosis of HER2-positive BC patients treated with NAT to that of patients treated with adjuvant therapy.

methodsThis was a single-center real-world retrospective study. This study analyzed the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 538 HER2-positive BC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy and 2684 patients treated with adjuvant therapy at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) between 2012 and 2016. Patients with a clinical tumor size (cT) ≤5 cm or >5 cm were matched using the propensity score matching (PSM) method to prevent selection bias.

resultsAfter PSM, among patients with cT ≤ 5 cm, there was no significant difference in DFS (P = 0.08) or OS (P = 0.11) between the two groups. The analysis of survival outcomes of patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in the different chemotherapy subgroups yielded consistent results. According to multivariate analysis, lymph node status and response to NAT showed independent prognostic value for OS and DFS. Among patients with cT > 5 cm, the DFS (P = 0.25) and OS (P = 0.57) of patients treated with NAT were similar to those of patients treated with adjuvant therapy after PSM.

conclusionWe confirmed the equivalent effects of adjuvant therapy and NAT in HER2-positive BC patients. Neoadjuvant therapy should be used for patients with HER2-positive BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantChinaDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesUniversitiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdjuvant therapyHER2-positive breast cancerNeoadjuvant therapySurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35429731
PMCPMC9038764
OpenAlexW4224036936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.