Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429530›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2022

Social support coping styles and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating role of sex.

Caitlin L McLean, Gage M Chu, Melissa M Karnaze, Cinnamon S Bloss, Ariel J Lang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of Coping Strategies on Perceived Stress and Hair Cortisol Levels During the COVID-19 Pandemic According to Sex.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin L McLeanVA San Diego Healthcare System, United States of America; University of California San Diego (UCSD), United States of America. Electronic address: c1mclean@health.ucsd.edu.
Gage M ChuVA San Diego Healthcare System, United States of America; University of California San Diego (UCSD), United States of America.
Melissa M KarnazeHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, UCSD, United States of America; Center for Empathy and Technology, T. Denny Sanford Institute for Empathy and Compassion, UCSD, United States of America.
Cinnamon S BlossHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, UCSD, United States of America; Center for Empathy and Technology, T. Denny Sanford Institute for Empathy and Compassion, UCSD, United States of America.
Ariel J LangUniversity of California San Diego (UCSD), United States of America; Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, UCSD, United States of America; VA San Diego Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health (CESAMH), United States of America.
Human Longevity (United States) · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the onset and exacerbation of mental health problems, such as stress, anxiety, and depression; yet stay-at-home-orders affected individuals' ability to make use of social support as a coping skill in managing distress. We aimed to evaluate how social support (emotional and instrumental) and biological sex were associated with stress, anxiety, and depression early in the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsParticipants (n = 7256) had an average age of 50.13 years (SD = 16.75) and 51.6% were male. Using a cross-sequential design, seven cohorts of individuals completed baseline (T1) and one-month follow-up (T2) questionnaires online from March to July of 2020. We used a series of hierarchical regressions to identify types of social support (Brief-COPE, T1) associated with stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10, T1 and T2), anxiety and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-4, T2).

resultsGreater emotional support was associated with less perceived stress, anxiety and depression (all ps < 0.001), whereas greater instrumental support predicted increased distress (all ps < 0.036) on all four outcomes. Moderation analyses revealed that greater emotional social support was associated with lower perceived stress at T1 for both women and men, with a stronger association for women relative to men. For women, greater emotional social support predicted lower anxiety. LIMITATIONS: Self-selection may have introduced bias and participant self-report on brief measures may not have fully captured coping and distress.

conclusionsInterventions enhancing emotional social support strategies, which appear especially important for women, might help manage enduring stressors such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Psychological DistressAdaptation, PsychologicalAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalCopingCOVID-19GenderSexSocial supportStress

Identifiers

PMID35429530
PMCPMC9005353
OpenAlexW4223901767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.