Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429309›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2022

PrEP uptake and delivery setting preferences among clients visiting six healthcare facilities in Eswatini.

Maxime Inghels, Hae-Young Kim, Frank Tanser, Anita Hettema, Shannon A McMahon, Catherine E Oldenburg, Sindy Matse, Stefan Kohler, Pascal Geldsetzer, Till Bärnighausen

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Maxime InghelsLincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, LN6 7TS, Lincoln, UK. maxime.inghels@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-2054
Hae-Young KimAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. hae-young.kim@nyulangone.org.
Frank TanserLincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, LN6 7TS, Lincoln, UK. FTanser@lincoln.ac.uk.
Anita HettemaClinton Health Access Initiative, H100, Mbabane, Eswatini, Swaziland. ahettema@clintonhealthaccess.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9764-2178
Shannon A McMahonHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. mcmahon@uni-heidelberg.de.
Catherine E OldenburgDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, 94115, San Francisco, CA, USA. catherine.oldenburg@ucsf.edu.
Sindy MatseEswatini Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Eswatini, Swaziland. matsesindy@gmail.com.
Stefan KohlerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. stefan.kohler@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-7506
Pascal GeldsetzerDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. pgeldsetzer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-5505
Till BärnighausenAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. till.baernighausen@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-4212
Heidelberg University · DEAfrica Health Research Institute · ZACarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DECentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAClinton Health Access Initiative · USInserm · FRJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Health · SZStanford Health Care · US

Funding

SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PREDICTORS OF PHYSICAL AND COGNITIVE FUNCTIONP01AG041710 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LISA F BERKMAN · 2013 to 2026
$37.3M
Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
Training Tanzanian Researchers for HIV/AIDS Implementation ScienceD43TW009775 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Wafaie W Fawzi, Christopher Sudfeld · 2015 to 2026
$3.0M
New Methods for the design and evaluation of large HIV prevention interventionsR01AI112339 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
Causal Pathways to population health impact of HIV antiretroviral treatmentR01HD084233 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2015 to 2021
$2.3M
Can HIV Hot-Spots be eradicated? An intervention to decrease HIV transmission to young women in rural KwaZulu-Natal South AfricaR01AI124389 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009775FIC NIH HHS D43-TW009775NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR003143NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112339NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI124389NIA NIH HHS P01 AG041710NIA NIH HHS P01-AG041710NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084233World Health Organization H9/181/R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the high HIV incidence among the general population of Eswatini, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV-exposed individuals is recommended. However, little is known about PrEP uptake and preferences in PrEP delivery healthcare setting among the general population. We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized trial that aimed to increase PrEP uptake. All clients eligible for PrEP in one of six public-sector healthcare facilities in Eswatini were included. PrEP uptake was stratified by initial reason for visit (e.g. outpatient). Preferences in PrEP delivery setting were collected among those clients who initiated PrEP. A total of 1782 clients had their HIV acquisition risk assessed. Of these, 72% (1277/1782) were considered at risk by healthcare providers and, among them, 40% (517/1277) initiated PrEP. Uptake was higher among clients visiting specifically to initiate PrEP (93%), followed by HIV testing visits (45.8%) and outpatient visits (40%). Among those who initiated PrEP, preferred delivery settings were outpatient services (31%), HIV testing services (26%), family planning (21%) and antenatal services (14%). Men or those at high risk of HIV acquisition were more likely to prefer HIV testing and outpatient services, while young women were more likely to visit and express a preference for antenatal and family planning services. Outpatient services and HIV testing services could be preferable choices for PrEP delivery integration, due to the high PrEP uptake and delivery setting preferences of the populations who use these services. Antenatal and family planning could also be considered with a view to targeting the youngest women.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAmbulatory Care FacilitiesDelivery of Health CareEswatiniFemaleHumansMalePregnancyAnti-HIV AgentsConsumer preferenceEswatiniHealth servicesHIVPre-Exposure Prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID35429309
PMCPMC9474345
OpenAlexW4223924355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.