Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429294›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2022

Fast and ballistic contractions involve greater neuromuscular power production in older adults during resistance exercise.

Emmet J Mc Dermott, Thomas G Balshaw, Katherine Brooke-Wavell, Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson, Jonathan P Folland

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07023146 (Adaptations Due to Different Intensities of Power Training on Neuromuscular Performance, Muscle Thickness and Functional Capacity in Elderly People), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07023146 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Adaptations Due to Different Intensities of Power Training on Neuromuscular Performance, Muscle Thickness and Functional Capacity in Elderly People: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Rio Grande do SulRan2025 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsInvestigating the Effects of Power Training in the ElderlyArmsModerate to high intensity (PTMH, 65-80% of 1-repetition maximum [1RM]) ), low to moderate intensity (PTLM, 40-60% of 1-repetition maximum [1RM])
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmet J Mc DermottVersus Arthritis, Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2606-1480
Thomas G BalshawVersus Arthritis, Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
Katherine Brooke-WavellSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.
Thomas M Maden-WilkinsonPhysical Activity, Wellness and Public Health Research Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Jonathan P FollandVersus Arthritis, Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK. J.P.Folland@lboro.ac.uk.
Loughborough University · GBSheffield Hallam University · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 21595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuromuscular power is critical for healthy ageing. Conventional older adult resistance training (RT) guidelines typically recommend lifting slowly (2-s; CONV), whereas fast/explosive contractions performed either non-ballistically (FAST-NB) or ballistically (FAST-B, attempting to throw the load) may involve greater acute power production, and could ultimately provide a greater chronic power adaptation stimulus. To compare the neuromechanics (power, force, velocity, and muscle activation) of different types of concentric isoinertial RT contractions in older adults.

methodsTwelve active older adult males completed three sessions, each randomly assigned to one type of concentric contraction (CONV or FAST-NB or FAST-B). Each session involved lifting a range of loads (20-80%1RM) using an instrumented isoinertial leg press dynamometer that measured power, force, and velocity. Muscle activation was assessed with surface electromyography (sEMG).

resultsPeak and mean power were markedly different, according to the concentric contraction explosive intent FAST-B > FAST-NB > CONV, with FAST-B producing substantially more power (+ 49 to 1172%, P ≤ 0.023), force (+ 10 to 136%, P < 0.05) and velocity (+ 55 to 483%, P ≤ 0.025) than CONV and FAST-NB contractions. Knee and hip extensor sEMG were typically higher during FAST-B than CON (all P < 0.02) and FAST-NB (≤ 50%1RM, P ≤ 0.001).

conclusionsFAST-B contractions produced markedly greater power, force, velocity and muscle activation across a range of loads than both CONV or FAST-NB and could provide a more potent RT stimulus for the chronic development of older adult power.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAgedElectromyographyExerciseHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthWeight LiftingAgeingMuscle activationNeuromechanicsResistance training prescription

Identifiers

PMID35429294
PMCPMC9197913
OpenAlexW4224074975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.