Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429160›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2022

Prediction in the Aging Brain: Merging Cognitive, Neurological, and Evolutionary Perspectives.

Rachel M Brown, Stefan L K Gruijters, Sonja A Kotz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Aging Impacts Basic Auditory and Timing Processes.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel M BrownInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4851-8429
Stefan L K GruijtersFaculty of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0141-0071
Sonja A KotzFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-4624

Funding

Marie Sklodowska-Curie International Fellowship 707865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the aging brain is typically characterized by declines in a variety of cognitive functions, there has been growing attention to cognitive functions that may stabilize or improve with age. We integrate evidence from behavioral, computational, and neurological domains under the hypothesis that over the life span the brain becomes more effective at predicting (i.e., utilizing knowledge) compared to learning. Moving beyond mere description of the empirical literature-with the aim of arriving at a deeper understanding of cognitive aging-we provide potential explanations for a learning-to-prediction shift based on evolutionary models and principles of senescence and plasticity. The proposed explanations explore whether the occurrence of a learning-to-prediction shift can be explained by (changes in) the fitness effects of learning and prediction over the life span. Prediction may optimize (a) the allocation of limited resources across the life span, and/or (b) late-life knowledge transfer (social learning). Alternatively, late-life prediction may reflect a slower decline in prediction compared to learning. By discussing these hypotheses, we aim to provide a foundation for an integrative neurocognitive-evolutionary perspective on aging and to stimulate further theoretical and empirical work.

Indexed as

AgingLongevityBiological EvolutionBrainCognitionHumansAgingEvolutionLearningPredictive processingSenescence

Identifiers

PMID35429160
PMCPMC9434449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.