Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429086›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2022

A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 publications in nursing by visual mapping method.

Ayşe Çiçek Korkmaz, Serap Altuntaş

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. How Much Do We Care about Teacher Burnout during the Pandemic: A Bibliometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayşe Çiçek KorkmazFaculty of Health Sciences Nursing Department, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Bandırma, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-1490
Serap AltuntaşFaculty of Health Sciences Nursing Department, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Bandırma, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-7736
Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study conducted a bibliometric analysis of nursing publications on the COVID-19 between 1 January 2020, and 24 October 2021.

backgroundCOVID-19 has been a hot research topic that has attracted many researchers from various disciplines. One of the ways to combat the COVID-19 pandemic is to produce knowledge and present it with a holistic approach. Therefore, it is crucial to make bibliometric and content analyses of scientific publications. Scientific data should be evaluated to keep up with the developments in the nursing profession and practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsData were collected from the Web of Science database. The sample consisted of 1280 publications that met the inclusion criteria. The data were analysed using descriptive content and bibliometric analysis. The VOSviewer, a mapping and visualization software program, was used for bibliometric analysis.

resultsThe United States is one of the countries with the highest number of publications, citations and international cooperation during the pandemic. Of all these publications, 1183 (92.42%) are original articles. The Journal of Nursing Management has the highest number of publications and citations. The publications focus primarily on the topics of COVID-19, pandemic, nursing, coronavirus and nurses. The current topics that the publications address are online education, online learning, practice, nursing student, perceived stress, stress, fear, quality of life and experience to determine the impacts of the pandemic on mental health nursing education.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has an impact on nursing, and the number of publications is increasing worldwide. In the early days of the pandemic, researchers focused on the topics of coronavirus infections, infection control, global health, health policy and nursing policy. Afterward, they addressed current topics, such as education and the psychological effects of the pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Our results will help nurse managers identify issues related to COVID-19 that have not been researched yet and have not been adequately explained in their own institutions. They will also help them choose appropriate journals to get their studies published, appropriate countries to cooperate with and access information about the studies on the subject matter. Our results will also help them make evidence-based decisions about mental health and nursing education.

Indexed as

COVID-19BibliometricsHumansInternational CooperationPandemicsQuality of LifeUnited Statesbibliometric analysiscontent analysisCOVID-19nursingVOSviewerWeb of Science

Identifiers

PMID35429086
PMCPMC9115144
OpenAlexW4223921775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.