Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35429001›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2022

Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Pediatric Lung POCUS: A Pilot Study of Novice Learners.

Benjamin Nti, Amalia S Lehmann, Aida Haddad, Sarah K Kennedy, Frances M Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. AI-Enhanced POCUS in Emergency Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin NtiDivision of Pediatric Education, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-9177
Amalia S LehmannDivision of Pediatric Education, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Aida HaddadDivision of Pediatric Education, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-5460
Sarah K KennedyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Frances M RussellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-7392

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRespiratory symptoms are among the most common chief complaints of pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) outperforms conventional chest X-ray and is user-dependent, which can be challenging to novice ultrasound (US) users. We introduce a novel concept using artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced pleural sweep to generate complete panoramic views of the lungs, and then assess its accuracy among novice learners (NLs) to identify pneumonia.

methodsPreviously healthy 0- to 17-year-old patients presenting to a pediatric ED with cardiopulmonary chief complaint were recruited. NLs received a 1-hour training on traditional lung POCUS and the AI-assisted software. Two POCUS-trained experts interpreted the images, which served as the criterion standard. Both expert and learner groups were blinded to each other's interpretation, patient data, and outcomes. Kappa was used to determine agreement between POCUS expert interpretations.

resultsSeven NLs, with limited to no prior POCUS experience, completed examinations on 32 patients. The average patient age was 5.53 years (±1.07). The median scan time of 7 minutes (minimum-maximum 3-43; interquartile 8). Three (8.8%) patients were diagnosed with pneumonia by criterion standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for NLs AI-augmented interpretation were 66.7% (confidence interval [CI] 9.4-99.1%), 96.5% (CI 82.2-99.9%), and 93.7% (CI 79.1-99.2%). The average image quality rating was 2.94 (±0.16) out of 5 across all lung fields. Interrater reliability between expert sonographers was high with a kappa coefficient of 0.8.

conclusionThis study shows that AI-augmented lung US for diagnosing pneumonia has the potential to increase accuracy and efficiency.

Indexed as

PneumoniaPoint-of-Care SystemsAdolescentArtificial IntelligenceChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLungPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyartificial intelligencelungpediatricsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35429001
PMCPMC9790545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.