Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428973›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Comparison of coronary revascularization strategies in older adults presenting with acute coronary syndromes.

Ahmed Ijaz Shah, Amy Alabaster, Makdine Dontsi, Jamal S Rana, Matthew D Solomon, Ashok Krishnaswami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Clinical and angiographic profile of left main coronary artery disease in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a retrospective study.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed Ijaz ShahDivision of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Amy AlabasterDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Makdine DontsiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Jamal S RanaDivision of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Matthew D SolomonDivision of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Ashok KrishnaswamiDivision of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center · US

Funding

Kaiser Permanente: Community Health Grant 1333786-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal coronary revascularization strategy to maximize the patient-centered outcome of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), in multimorbid older (≥65-years) adults after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is incompletely understood.

methodsUsing Kaiser Permanente Northern California Health Plan databases, we identified 3871 patients ≥65-years presenting with ACS between 1/1/2010-3/1/2018 who underwent coronary revascularization with either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, N = 1575) or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, N = 2296). Selection bias was accounted for through propensity score modeling techniques and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to evaluate the association of revascularization type with outcomes. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Absolute DAOH and the relative risk of achieving ≥90%DAOH during three time intervals. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality, recurrent MI, stroke, rehospitalization, repeat revascularization, and dialysis initiation.

resultsCABG (compared to PCI) was associated with greater absolute number of DAOH, significant after the first year (mean difference at 1-year: +5.8 days, 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.6 to 13 days; 3-years: +56 days, 95%CI, +25 to +88 days; 5-years: + 131 days, 95%CI, +57 to +205 days). The relative risk of achieving ≥90% DAOH significantly favored CABG after the first year (1-year:1.02, 95%CI, 0.98-1.05; 3-years:1.06, 95%CI 1.002-1.11, 5-years:1.12, 95%CI, 1.03-1.22), and was related to lower incidences of all-cause mortality, repeat revascularization, rehospitalization, incident dialysis, and nonfatal MI with CABG.

conclusionsIn older adults with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease who presented with ACS, CABG, after the first year, was associated with a greater absolute number of DAOH-a geriatric and patient-centered outcome, compared to PCI. CABG patients also had a higher probability of achieving ≥90%DAOH-with lower all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, repeat revascularization, new dialysis, and rehospitalization rates. Future randomized trials should study the impact of optimal revascularization strategies on the quality of life of older adults with multimorbidity.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeCoronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedCoronary Artery BypassHumansQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomecoronary artery bypass graftingcoronary revascularizationdays alive and out of hospitalpatient-centered outcomepercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID35428973
OpenAlexW4223968171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.