Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428945›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection.

Vicky Maertens, Samuel Stefan, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Najaf Siddiqi, Gerald David, Jim S Khan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vicky MaertensDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-1395
Samuel StefanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Ioannis MykoniatisDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Najaf SiddiqiUniversity Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Dorset, UK.
Gerald DavidDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Jim S KhanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK. jim.khan@porthosp.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-4495
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPoole Hospital · GBQueen Alexandra Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI ≤ 28) and group 2 (BMI ≥ 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresColectomyDissectionHumansLymph Node ExcisionOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplete mesocolic excisionObese patientsRobotic colorectal surgeryRobotic ultrasound scan

Identifiers

PMID35428945
PMCPMC9939489
OpenAlexW4224026819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.