Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428896›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2022

Extending the viability of human precision-cut intestinal slice model for drug metabolism studies.

C Biel, O Martinec, B Sibering, K van Summeren, A M A Wessels, D J Touw, K P de Jong, V E de Meijer, K N Faber, J P Ten Klooster and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Host-parasite interactions duringFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. In Vitro Models for Investigating Intestinal Host-Pathogen Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C BielDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
O MartinecDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
B SiberingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
K van SummerenInnovative Testing in Life Science & Chemistry Group, Utrecht University of Applied Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A M A WesselsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
D J TouwDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
K P de JongDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
V E de MeijerDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
K N FaberDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J P Ten KloosterInnovative Testing in Life Science & Chemistry Group, Utrecht University of Applied Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
I A M de GraafDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Toxicology & Targeting, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
P OlingaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.olinga@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-8452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Precision-cut intestinal slices (hPCIS) are used to study intestinal physiology, pathophysiology, drug efficacy, toxicology, kinetics, and metabolism. However, the use of this ex vivo model is restricted to approximately a 24 h timeframe because of declining viability of the hPCIS during traditional culture. We hypothesized that we could extend the hPCIS viability by using organoid medium. Therefore, we cultured hPCIS for up to 72 h in organoid media [expansion medium (Emed) and differentiation medium (Dmed)]. After incubation, we assessed culture-induced changes on viability markers, specific cell type markers and we assessed the metabolic activity of enterocytes by measuring midazolam metabolite formation. We show that the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)/protein ratio of Emed-cultured hPCIS and morphology of both Emed- and Dmed-cultured hPCIS was improved compared to WME-cultured hPCIS. Emed-cultured hPCIS showed an increased expression of proliferation and stem cell markers, whereas Dmed-cultured hPCIS showed an increased expression of proliferation and enterocyte markers, along with increased midazolam metabolism. Using the Emed, the viability of hPCIS could be extended for up to 72 h, and proliferating stem cells remained preserved. Using Dmed, hPCS also remained viable for up to 72 h, and specifically rescued the metabolizing enterocytes during culture. In conclusion, by using two different organoid culture media, we could extend the hPCIS viability for up to 72 h of incubation and specifically steer stem cells or enterocytes towards their original function, metabolism, and proliferation, potentially allowing pharmacokinetic and toxicology studies beyond the 24 h timeframe.

Indexed as

IntestinesMidazolamCulture MediaHumansInactivation, MetabolicOrganoidsCulture MediaMidazolamDrug metabolismEx vivo modelHuman precision-cut intestinal slicesOrganoid mediumViability

Identifiers

PMID35428896
PMCPMC9095520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.