ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
The impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal cancer survivorship program at a single tertiary centre: has service provision changed after COVID-19?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- The impact of extended invitation intervals on stage distribution of screen-detected and interval cancer within the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Initial and persistent changes in cancer screening in a US Midwestern community health center network following the onset of COVID-19.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Delays in Diagnostic Colonoscopy After Positive FIT in an Integrated Healthcare System.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer in two Indiana healthcare systems.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- How COVID-19 Impacted Colonoscopy Utilization and Colorectal Cancer Detection in Hawai'i in 2020.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2024Article
- Noteworthy impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening: A systematic review.Fundamental research · 2024Review
- Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on colorectal cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Colorectal Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Delayed but Not Forgotten.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Assessing Changes in Colon Cancer Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Four-Year Analysis at a Romanian University Hospital.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Canadian Landscape Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- New Cancer Diagnoses Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Advances in Analgosedation and Periprocedural Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Interest of Google Queries in Cancer Screening and Cancers: A Retrospective Study.Cancers · 2023Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on endoscopy and cancer screening: a focus on access and equity.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Colorectal Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Before vs During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Colonoscopy Following an Abnormal Fecal Test Result from an Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Federally Qualified Health Center.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a partial to total shutdown of endoscopy in many healthcare centers. This study aims to quantify the impact of the reduction in colonoscopies on colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and screening.
methodsAfter institutional ethics board approval, the endoscopy database at an academic tertiary-care center in Montreal, Canada, was searched for all colonoscopies performed from during the first wave locally (March-June 2020), and during the ramp up period where endoscopy service resumed (July to August 2020). We compared these periods to the same periods in 2019, the pre-pandemic periods. The indications, CRC and adenoma detection rates, as well as the prioritization of urgent procedures were compared.
resultsIn the first wave, only 462 colonoscopies were performed, compared to 2515 in the same period in 2019, an 82% reduction. The ramp up period saw 843 colonoscopies performed compared to 1328 in 2019, a 35% reduction. Urgent and inpatient colonoscopies numbers increased (324 (24.8%) vs. 220 (5.7%)) while surveillance and high-risk screening colonoscopies fell (376 (28.8%) vs 1869 (48.6%)). Emergency access to colonoscopy was preserved with a median time to endoscopy of < 1 day (IQR 0,1) in both pandemic periods. During the pandemic periods, there was an absolute reduction in CRC diagnosis of 28, despite the CRC detection per colonoscopy rate increasing slightly in the first wave from 1.7% (44) to 3.9% (18), and in the ramp up period from 2.5% (33) to 3.6% (31). The rate of adenoma detection per colonoscopy did not increase significantly between the pre- and pandemic periods, resulting in reduction in adenoma removal in 723 patients. DISCUSSION: The restriction of access to colonoscopy resulted in a significant reduction in screening and surveillance of high-risk patients, adenomas removed, and CRCs diagnosed. Clinicians and patients will face the oncologic ramifications this the coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.