Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428886›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2022

Advancing quality and safety of perinatal services in India: opportunities for effective midwifery integration.

Saraswathi Vedam, Reena Titoria, Paulomi Niles, Kathrin Stoll, Vishwajeet Kumar, Dinesh Baswal, Kaveri Mayra, Inderjeet Kaur, Pandora Hardtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saraswathi VedamDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 304-5950 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6396-3638
Reena TitoriaPopulation Health Observatory, Fraser Health Authority, Suite 400, Central City Tower 13450 - 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC V3T 0H1, Canada.
Paulomi NilesRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, 433 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA.
Kathrin StollDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 304-5950 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Vishwajeet KumarCommunity Empowerment Lab, 26/11 Wazir Hasan Road, Gokhale Marg, Lucknow, UP 226001, India.
Dinesh BaswalMAMTA Health Institute for Mother and Child, B-5, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, New Delhi 110048, India.
Kaveri MayraGlobal Health Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Inderjeet KaurFernandez Foundation, Fernandez Hospital, 4-1-120, Bogulkunta, Hyderabad 500001, India.
Pandora HardtmanJohns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics, John Hopkins University, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationWhite Ribbon Alliance AWD-016861 WHTRIBAL 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India has made significant progress in improving maternal and child health. However, there are persistent disparities in maternal and child morbidity and mortality in many communities. Mistreatment of women in childbirth and gender-based violence are common and reduce women's sense of safety. Recently, the Government of India committed to establishing a specialized midwifery cadre: Nurse Practitioners in Midwifery (NPMs). Integration of NPMs into the current health system has the potential to increase respectful maternity care, reduce unnecessary interventions, and improve resource allocation, ultimately improving maternal-newborn outcomes. To synthesize the evidence on effective midwifery integration, we conducted a desk review of peer-reviewed articles, reports and regulatory documents describing models of practice, organization of health services and lessons learned from other countries. We also interviewed key informants in India who described the current state of the healthcare system, opportunities, and anticipated challenges to establishing a new cadre of midwives. Using an intersectional feminist theoretical framework, we triangulated the findings from the desk review with interview data to identify levers for change and recommendations. Findings from the desk review highlight that benefits of midwifery on outcomes and experience link to models of midwifery care, and limited scope of practice and prohibitive practice settings are threats to successful integration. Interviews with key informants affirm the importance of meeting global standards for practice, education, inter-professional collaboration and midwifery leadership. Key informants noted that the expansion of respectful maternity care and improved outcomes will depend on the scope and model of practice for the cadre. Domains needing attention include building professional identity; creating a robust, sustainable education system; addressing existing inter-professional issues and strengthening referral and quality monitoring systems. Public and professional education on midwifery roles and scope of practice, improved regulatory conditions and enabling practice environments will be key to successful integration of midwives in India.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesMidwiferyChildDelivery, ObstetricDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancycommunity healthHealth servicesintegrationmaternity servicesmothersnational health servicenurse practitionerspolicy implementationpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35428886
PMCPMC9469892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.