Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428875›Full record

ArticleGenes and immunity2022

Rhesus negative males have an enhanced IFNγ-mediated immune response to influenza A virus.

Jamie A Sugrue, Megan Smith, Celine Posseme, Bruno Charbit, Milieu Interieur Consortium, Nollaig M Bourke, Darragh Duffy, Cliona O'Farrelly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes and immunity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Jamie A SugrueSchool of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. sugruej@tcd.ie.ORCID 0000-0001-7270-3838
Megan SmithSchool of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Celine PossemeTranslational Immunology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Bruno CharbitCytometry and Biomarkers UTechS, CRT, Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Milieu Interieur Consortium
Nollaig M Bourke *Department of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Darragh Duffy *Translational Immunology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8875-2308
Cliona O'Farrelly *School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IEÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHInserm · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRKarolinska Institutet · SEInstitut Curie · FRRoche (France) · FRUniversité Sorbonne Paris Nord · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rhesus D antigen (RhD) has been associated with susceptibility to several viral infections. Reports suggest that RhD-negative individuals are better protected against infectious diseases and have overall better health. However, potential mechanisms contributing to these associations have not yet been defined. Here, we used transcriptomic and genomic data from the Milieu Interieur cohort of 1000 healthy individuals to explore the effect of Rhesus status on the immune response. We used the rs590787 SNP in the RHD gene to classify the 1000 donors as either RhD-positive or -negative. Whole blood was stimulated with LPS, polyIC, and the live influenza A virus and the NanoString human immunology panel of 560 genes used to assess donor immune response and to investigate sex-specific effects. Using regression analysis, we observed no significant differences in responses to polyIC or LPS between RhD-positive and -negative individuals. However, upon sex-specific analysis, we observed over 40 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between RhD-positive (n = 384) and RhD-negative males (n = 75) after influenza virus stimulation. Interestingly these Rhesus-associated differences were not seen in females. Further investigation, using gene set enrichment analysis, revealed enhanced IFNγ signalling in RhD-negative males. This amplified IFNγ signalling axis may explain the increased viral resistance previously described in RhD-negative individuals.

Indexed as

Influenza A virusFemaleHumansImmunityLipopolysaccharidesMaleLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID35428875
PMCPMC9012157
OpenAlexW4224030543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.