Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A quantitative approach to the spread of variance in translational research using Monte Carlo simulation.

Feyza Cukurova, Britta P Gustavson, Andres G Griborio-Guzman, Leonard A Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Feyza CukurovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Britta P GustavsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Andres G Griborio-GuzmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Leonard A LevinDepartment of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. leonard.levin@mcgill.ca.

Funding

Development of redox-active therapies for ischemic optic neuropathyR21EY025074 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LEVIN, LEONARD A · 2015 to 2016
$421k
CIHR PJT-162396NEI NIH HHS R21EY025074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The translation of promising preclinical research into successful trials often fails. One contributing factor is the "Princess and the Pea" problem, which refers to how an initially significant effect size dissipates as research transitions to more complex systems. This work aimed to quantify the effects of spreading variability on sample size requirements. Sample size estimates were performed by Monte Carlo simulation. To simulate the process of progressing from preclinical to clinical studies, nested sigmoidal dose-response transformations with modifiable input parameter variability were used. The results demonstrated that adding variabilty to the dose-response parameters substantially increases sample size requirements compared to standared calculations. Increasing the number of consecutive studies further increases the sample size. These results quantitatively demonstrate how the spread of variability in translational research, which is not typically accounted for, can result in drastic increases in the sample size required to maintain a desired study power.

Indexed as

Research DesignTranslational Research, BiomedicalComputer SimulationMonte Carlo MethodSample Size

Identifiers

PMID35428790
PMCPMC9012853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.