ArticleScientific reports2022
Culture and multiomic analysis of lung cancer patient-derived pleural effusions revealed distinct druggable molecular types.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous tumor-immune effusion cocultures enable ex vivo functional profiling of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- Pathobiology and clinical significance of malignant pleural effusions.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting CD155 in lung adenocarcinoma: A5 nanobody-based therapeutics for precision treatment and enhanced drug delivery.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Article
- Establishment and characterization of 24 breast cancer cell lines and 3 breast cancer organoids reveals molecular heterogeneity and drug response variability in malignant pleural effusion-derived models.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Molecular and functional landscape of malignant serous effusions for precision oncology.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Albumin Paclitaxel Combined with Intrapleural Infusion of Bevacizumab + Lobaplatin for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an independent determinant of poor prognostic factor of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The course of anchorage independent growth within the pleural cavity likely reforms the innate molecular characteristics of malignant cells, which largely accounts for resistance to chemotherapy and poor prognosis after the surgical resection. Nevertheless, the genetic and transcriptomic features with respect to various drug responses of MPE-complicated NSCLC remain poorly understood. To obtain a clearer overview of the MPE-complicated NSCLC, we established 28 MPE-derived lung cancer cell lines which were subjected to genomic, transcriptomic and pharmacological analysis. Our results demonstrated MPE-derived NSCLC cell lines recapitulated representative driver mutations generally found in the primary NSCLC. It also exhibited the presence of distinct translational subtypes in accordance with the mutational profiles. The drug responses of several targeted chemotherapies accords with both genomic and transcriptomic characteristics of MPE-derived NSCLC cell lines. Our data also suggest that the impending drawback of mutation-based clinical diagnosis in evaluating MPE-complicated NSCLS patient responses. As a potential solution, our work showed the importance of comprehending transcriptomic characteristics in order to defy potential drug resistance caused by MPE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.