ArticleScientific reports2022
A deep learning model to classify and detect brain abnormalities in portable microwave based imaging system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined Use of Microwave Sensing Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Monitoring and Imaging.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Toward reliable computer-aided brain tumor diagnosis: a contrast-enhanced deep learning approach with hybrid KNN classification.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Automated detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis based on cloud computing.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- From Detection to Diagnosis: An Advanced Transfer Learning Pipeline Using YOLO11 with Morphological Post-Processing for Brain Tumor Analysis for MRI Images.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Accurate and real-time brain tumour detection and classification using optimized YOLOv5 architecture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Streaks on martian slopes are dry.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Automated Brain Tumor segmentation using hybrid YOLO and SAM.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- A Global Dataset of Potential Chloride Deposits on Mars as Identified by TGO CaSSIS.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Near-field microwave sensing technology enhanced with machine learning for the non-destructive evaluation of packaged food and beverage products.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical electromagnetic brain scanner.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhancing brain tumor detection in MRI images using YOLO-NeuroBoost model.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- A deep learning model for the localization and extraction of brain tumors from MR images using YOLOv7 and grab cut algorithm.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of a deep learning model using YOLOv5 for detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip on radiography images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification from Sensor-Based Portable Microwave Brain Imaging System Using Lightweight Deep Learning Models.Biosensors · 2023Article
- A Lightweight Deep Learning Based Microwave Brain Image Network Model for Brain Tumor Classification Using Reconstructed Microwave Brain (RMB) Images.Biosensors · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated classification and detection of brain abnormalities like a tumor(s) in reconstructed microwave (RMW) brain images are essential for medical application investigation and monitoring disease progression. This paper presents the automatic classification and detection of human brain abnormalities through the deep learning-based YOLOv5 object detection model in a portable microwave head imaging system (MWHI). Initially, four hundred RMW image samples, including non-tumor and tumor(s) in different locations are collected from the implemented MWHI system. The RMW image dimension is 640 × 640 pixels. After that, image pre-processing and augmentation techniques are applied to generate the training dataset, consisting of 4400 images. Later, 80% of images are used to train the models, and 20% are used for testing. Later, from the 80% training dataset, 20% are utilized to validate the models. The detection and classification performances are evaluated by three variations of the YOLOv5 model: YOLOv5s, YOLOv5m, and YOLOv5l. It is investigated that the YOLOv5l model performed better compared to YOLOv5s, YOLOv5m, and state-of-the-art object detection models. The achieved accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, mean average precision (mAP), and classification loss are 96.32%, 95.17%, 94.98%, 95.28%, 95.53%, 96.12%, and 0.0130, respectively for the YOLOv5l model. The YOLOv5l model automatically detected tumor(s) accurately with a predicted bounding box including objectness score in RMW images and classified the tumors into benign and malignant classes. So, the YOLOv5l object detection model can be reliable for automatic tumor(s) detection and classification in a portable microwave brain imaging system as a real-time application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.