Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428739›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurointerventional surgery2023

Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study.

Jiří Fiedler, Martin Roubec, Marek Grubhoffer, Svatopluk Ostrý, Václav Procházka, Kateřina Langová, David Školoudík, EMIAS Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jiří Fiedler *Department of Neurosurgery, Nemocnice České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Jihočeský, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7886-6021
Martin Roubec *Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Moravskoslezský, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-4284
Marek GrubhofferDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nemocnice České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Jihočeský, Czech Republic.
Svatopluk OstrýDepartment of Neurology, Nemocnice České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Jihočeský, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-7922
Václav ProcházkaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Moravskoslezský, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-2314
Kateřina LangováDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Olomoucký, Czech Republic.
David ŠkoloudíkCenter for Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Moravskoslezský, Czech Republic skoloudik@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2651-3424
EMIAS Study Group
Charles University · CZUniversity of Ostrava · CZPalacký University Olomouc · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite all the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics since 2015, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion portends a catastrophic outcome.

objectiveTo test the safety and efficacy of emergent microsurgical intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke and symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion after failure of mechanical thrombectomy.

methodsA prospective two-center cohort study was conducted. Patients with acute ischemic stroke and middle cerebral artery occlusion for whom recanalization failed at center 1 were randomly allocated to the microsurgical intervention group (MSIG) or control group 1 (CG1). All similar patients at center 2 were included in the control group 2 (CG2) with no surgical intervention. Microsurgical embolectomy and/or extracranial-intracranial bypass was performed in all MSIG patients at center 1.

resultsA total of 47 patients were enrolled in the study: 22 at center 1 (12 allocated to the MSIG and 10 to the CG1) and 25 patients at center 2 (CG2). MSIG group patients showed a better clinical outcome on day 90 after the stroke, where a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 was reached in 7 (58.3%) of 12 patients compared with 1/10 (10.0%) patients in the CG1 and 3/12 (12.0%) in the CG2.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the potential for existing microsurgical techniques to provide good outcomes in 58% of microsurgically treated patients as a third-tier option.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeCarotid Artery, InternalCohort StudiesHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeStrokeThrombectomyThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID35428739
PMCPMC10176344
OpenAlexW4223936361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.