ArticleBMJ open2022
Perinatal and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome in late preterm fetal compromise: the TRUFFLE 2 randomised trial protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Placental Growth Factor Led Management of the Small for Gestational Age Fetus: Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Trial
- Awaiting results of the TRUFFLE-2 randomized controlled trial: what are the expectations among investigators?Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026Article
- Fetal Growth Restriction: Contemporary Evidence to Guide Delivery Timing and Intrapartum Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Impact of Fetal Growth Restriction on Myocardial Development from Fetal Life to Early Childhood: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Placental dysfunction drives fetal growth restriction: mechanisms and translational perspectives.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Fetal Growth Restriction, Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Connecting the Dots: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Perinatal impacts of fetal growth velocity on small-for-gestational-age fetuses: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary center.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Antenatal Corticosteroids in Early and Late Fetal Growth Restriction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Fetal Growth Restriction: A Pragmatic Approach.American journal of perinatology · 2025Review
- Superior vena cava blood flow and Doppler indices of brain sparing in late onset fetal growth restriction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reproducibility of fetal ultrasound doppler parameters used for growth assessment.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Looking back on preterm birth - The successes and failures.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Antenatal corticosteroids and perinatal outcome in late fetal growth restriction: analysis of prospective cohort.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023Observational
- Current practice in the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: An international survey.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Doppler Ultrasound of the Umbilical Artery: Clinical Application.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
60 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFollowing the detection of fetal growth restriction, there is no consensus about the criteria that should trigger delivery in the late preterm period. The consequences of inappropriate early or late delivery are potentially important yet practice varies widely around the world, with abnormal findings from fetal heart rate monitoring invariably leading to delivery. Indices derived from fetal cerebral Doppler examination may guide such decisions although there are few studies in this area. We propose a randomised, controlled trial to establish the optimum method of timing delivery between 32 weeks and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. We hypothesise that delivery on evidence of cerebral blood flow redistribution reduces a composite of perinatal poor outcome, death and short-term hypoxia-related morbidity, with no worsening of neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with non-anomalous singleton pregnancies 32+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation in whom the estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference is <10th percentile or has decreased by 50 percentiles since 18-32 weeks will be included for observational data collection. Participants will be randomised if cerebral blood flow redistribution is identified, based on umbilical to middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio values. Computerised cardiotocography (cCTG) must show normal fetal heart rate short term variation (≥4.5 msec) and absence of decelerations at randomisation. Randomisation will be 1:1 to immediate delivery or delayed delivery (based on cCTG abnormalities or other worsening fetal condition). The primary outcome is poor condition at birth and/or fetal or neonatal death and/or major neonatal morbidity, the secondary non-inferiority outcome is 2-year infant general health and neurodevelopmental outcome based on the Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised questionnaire. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Study Coordination Centre has obtained approval from London-Riverside Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Regulatory Authority (HRA). Publication will be in line with NIHR Open Access policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Main sponsor: Imperial College London, Reference: 19QC5491. Funders: NIHR HTA, Reference: 127 976. Study coordination centre: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS with Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical & Life Sciences, Cardiff University. IRAS Project ID: 266 400. REC reference: 20/LO/0031. ISRCTN registry: 76 016 200.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.