Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428627›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effectiveness of the eVISualisation of physical activity and pain intervention (eVIS) in Swedish Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programmes: study protocol for a registry-based randomised controlled clinical trial.

Veronica Sjöberg, Elena Tseli, Andreas Monnier, Jens Westergren, Riccardo LoMartire, Björn O Äng, Maria Hagströmer, Mathilda Björk, Linda Vixner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05009459 (eVISualisation of Physical Activity and Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05009459 narecruitingnot on this map

eVISualisation of Physical Activity and Pain (eVIS) for Patients With Chronic Pain Participating in Swedish Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs: a Registry-based Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDalarna UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled280ConditionsChronic PainArmseVIS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Veronica SjöbergDepartment of Sport and Medicin, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden vsj@du.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3843-0407
Elena TseliDepartment of Sport and Medicin, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-259X
Andreas MonnierDepartment of Sport and Medicin, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Jens WestergrenDepartment of Sport and Medicin, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8356-4669
Riccardo LoMartireDepartment of Research and Higher Education, Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Region Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Björn O ÄngDepartment of Sport and Medicin, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Maria HagströmerDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Mathilda BjörkDepartment for Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Community Medicine, Division of Occupational Therapy, Institution of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
Linda VixnerDepartment of Sport and Medicin, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLiving with chronic pain often involves negative consequences. Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programmes (IPRP) is considered superior to single-treatment measures in patients with chronic pain. Despite this, effects emerge suboptimal and more than 20% of patients deteriorate in patient-reported physical health outcomes after IPRP. A novel e-Health intervention, eVISualisation (eVIS) of physical activity and pain, was systematically developed to facilitate individualisation of physical activity levels. By adding elements of data collection, visualisation and communication of objectively measured physical activity and patient-reported outcomes (pain intensity, interference of pain, pharmaceutical consumption) to existing treatment modalities in IPRP, the IPRP team acquires prerequisites to adapt advice and physical activity prescriptions and to evaluate set activity goals. The overall aim is twofold. First, the aim is to evaluate the feasibility of the subsequent registry-based randomised controlled clinical trial (R-RCT). Second, the aim is to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the eVIS-intervention as a supplement to IPRP on our defined primary (physical health) and secondary outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In the R-RCT, recruitment of 400 patients with chronic pain will be performed at 15 IPRP units. A random allocation to either IPRP + eVIS or to control group that will receive IPRP only will be performed. Data from the initial 30 participants completing the study period (6 months) will be included in a pilot study, where key feasibility outcomes (recruitment, randomisation, implementation, treatment integrity, data collection procedure, preliminary outcome measures) will be evaluated. Outcome variables will be extracted from the web application Pain And TRaining ON-line (PATRON) and from six national registries. Multivariate statistics and repeated measure analyses will be performed. Quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated for cost-effectiveness evaluation. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: The Swedish Ethics Review Board granted approval (Dnr 2021/02109). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05009459. Protocol V.1.

Indexed as

Chronic PainCost-Benefit AnalysisExerciseHumansPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegistriesSwedenpain managementprotocols & guidelinestelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35428627
PMCPMC9014054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.