Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428624›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

What are patients' first-time experiences with video consulting? A qualitative interview study in Danish general practice in times of COVID-19.

Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, Nina Primholdt Christensen, Anette Grønning, Carole Jepsen, Elle Christine Lüchau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. The obscured face in video consultations. A Levinasian analysis.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perspectives: Reflections on the use of video consultations.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth Assing HvidtDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ehvidt@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-3762-8478
Nina Primholdt ChristensenHaematological Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark.
Anette GrønningDepartment for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5782-9739
Carole JepsenDepartment for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Elle Christine LüchauDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the experiences of Danish patients using video consultation (VC) to consult their general practitioner (GP) during COVID-19 lockdown and their attitudes towards continued use beyond COVID-19.

designA qualitative design was employed, consisting of individual semi-structured interviews where participants were asked to retrospectively describe their experiences and reflections. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

settingCapital and Southern Regions of Denmark.

participants27 patients (17 women and 10 men) aged between 23 and 76 years who had used VC once or more during the COVID-19 pandemic participated. The data were collected from February to October 2020. We used a convenience sampling technique and sample size was based on the principle of information power.

resultsThree overarching themes, each containing subthemes, were developed. Participants described pre-use reactions and concerns relating to VC as being 'better than nothing' given the COVID-19 circumstances, and preferred VC over a telephone consultation. Salient pre-use concerns related to whether the technology 'would work' and whether VC would influence consultation length and GP behaviour. Overall, participants reported positive experiences of VC use and communication attributing these mainly to 'knowing the GP' and 'feeling seen and heard'. Participants were interested in future VC use for many needs as a natural consequence of an increasingly digitalised society, not least due to COVID-19.

conclusionsOur findings contribute with knowledge about first-user experiences of VC against the background of COVID-19. Participants showed positive attitudes towards future use of VC as either a supplementary or alternative consultation form in general practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeAdultAgedCommunicable Disease ControlDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesTelephoneYoung AdultCOVID-19QUALITATIVE RESEARCHTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35428624
PMCPMC9013986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.