Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428623›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Antiretroviral therapy uptake and predictors of virological failure in patients with HIV receiving first-line and second-line regimens in Johannesburg, South Africa: a retrospective cohort data analysis.

Siphamandla Bonga Gumede, Francois Venter, John de Wit, Annemarie Wensing, Samanta Tresha Lalla-Edward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. HIV Viral Re-Suppression on Second-Line ART in Southern Zimbabwe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siphamandla Bonga GumedeDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands sgumede@cartafrica.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7870-1363
Francois VenterEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
John de WitDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Annemarie WensingDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Samanta Tresha Lalla-EdwardEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-1643

Funding

Integrating HIV and hEART health in South Africa (iHeart-SA)UG3HL156388 · NHLBI · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI ALI, MOHAMMED KUMAIL, MARCONI, VINCENT CHARLES · 2020 to 2021
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL156388Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study described the demographics, treatment information and identified characteristics associated with virological failure and being lost to follow-up (LTFU) for patients with HIV on first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens in a large South African cohort.

designA quantitative retrospective cohort study using secondary data analysis.

settingSeven Johannesburg inner city facilities.

participantsUnique records of 123 002 people with HIV receiving ART at any point in the period 1 April 2004 to 29 February 2020 were included. MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, ART status, CD4 count information and retention status were collected and analysed as covariates of outcomes (viral load (VL) and LTFU).

resultsOf the total study patients, 95% (n=1 17 260) were on a first-line regimen and 5% (n=5742) were on a second-line regimen. Almost two-thirds were female (64%, n=79 226). Most patients (60%, n=72 430) were initiated on an efavirenz-based, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based and emtricitabine-based regimen (fixed-dose combination). 91% (n=76 737) achieved viral suppression at least once since initiating on ART and 60% (n=57 981) remained in care as at the end of February 2020. Patients from the community health centre and primary healthcare clinics were not only more likely to be virally suppressed but also more likely to be LTFU. Patients on second-line regimens were less likely to reach viral suppression (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.26, CI=0.23 to 0.28) and more likely to be LTFU (aOR=1.21, CI=1.09 to 1.35). Being older (≥25 years) and having a recent CD4 cell count≥100 cells/µL were predictors of viral suppression and retention in patients on ART.

conclusionPatients on first-line regimens had higher VL suppression rates and were more likely to remain in care than those on a second-line regimen. Being younger and having low CD4 cell counts were associated with poor outcomes, suggesting priority groups for ART adherence support.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCohort StudiesData AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaViral LoadAnti-HIV AgentsHIV & AIDSPRIMARY CAREPublic health

Identifiers

PMID35428623
PMCPMC9013990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.