Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428621›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0).

Otto Ettala, Ivan Jambor, Ileana Montoya Perez, Marjo Seppänen, Antti Kaipia, Heikki Seikkula, Kari T Syvänen, Pekka Taimen, Janne Verho, Aida Steiner and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04287088 (Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men With Suspicion of Prostate Cancer - A Multi-centre Trial on Clinical Utility of IMPROD bpMRI in a Shared Decision Making Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04287088 narecruitingnot on this map

Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men With Suspicion of Prostate Cancer - A Multi-centre Trial on Clinical Utility of IMPROD bpMRI in a Shared Decision Making Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2020 to 2041Enrolled600ConditionsProstate CancerArmsA shared decision making
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Otto EttalaDepartment of Urology, TYKS Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland otto.ettala@tyks.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-4602
Ivan JamborDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Ileana Montoya PerezMedical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, TYKS Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Marjo SeppänenDepartment of Urology, Satakunta Hospital District, Pori, Satakunta, Finland.
Antti KaipiaDepartment of Urology, Tampere University, Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland.
Heikki SeikkulaDepartment of Urology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Kari T SyvänenDepartment of Urology, TYKS Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Pekka TaimenDepartment of Pathology, TYKS Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Janne VerhoMedical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, TYKS Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Aida SteinerMedical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, TYKS Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Jani SaunavaaraDepartment of Medical Physics, TYKS Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Ekaterina SaukkoMedical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, TYKS Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Eliisa LöyttyniemiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Daniel D SjobergDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew VickersIntegrative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Hannu AronenMedical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, TYKS Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Peter BoströmDepartment of Urology, TYKS Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FIMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCentral Finland Health Care District · FISatakunta Central Hospital · FITampere University · FI

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEuropean Association of Urology and UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend that all men with suspicions of prostate cancer should undergo prebiopsy contrast enhanced, that is, multiparametric prostate MRI. Subsequent prostate biopsies should also be performed if MRI is positive, that is, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores 3-5. However, several retrospective post hoc analyses have shown that this approach still leads to many unnecessary biopsy procedures. For example, 88%-96% of men with PI-RADS, three findings are still diagnosed with clinically non-significant prostate cancer or no cancer at all. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial, being conducted in Finland, to demonstrate non-inferiority in clinically significant cancer detection rates among men undergoing prostate biopsies post-MRI and men undergoing prostate biopsies post-MRI only after a shared decision based on individualised risk estimation. Men without previous diagnosis of prostate cancer and with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and/or prostate-specific antigen between 2.5 ug/L and 20.0 ug/L are included. We aim to recruit 830 men who are randomised at a 1:1 ratio into control (all undergo biopsies after MRI) and intervention arms (the decision to perform biopsies is based on risk estimation and shared decision-making). The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher). We will also compare the overall biopsy rate, benign biopsy rate and the detection of non-significant prostate cancer between the two study groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study (protocol V.2.0, 4 January 2021) was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland (IORG number: 0001744, IBR number: 00002216; trial number: 99/1801/2019). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. Full reports of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals, mainly urology and radiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04287088; the study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective Studiesmagnetic resonance imagingprostate diseaseurological tumours

Identifiers

PMID35428621
PMCPMC9014036
OpenAlexW4224084711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.