Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428614›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Evaluation of medication risk at the transition of care: a cross-sectional study of patients from the ICU to the non-ICU setting.

Yao Wang, Xueting Zhang, Xu Hu, Xuqun Sun, Yuanyuan Wang, Kaiyu Huang, Sijia Sun, Xiongwen Lv, Xuefeng Xie

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yao Wang *School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xueting Zhang *School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xu HuSchool of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xuqun SunDepartment of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yuanyuan WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Kaiyu HuangSchool of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Sijia SunSchool of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xiongwen LvSchool of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xuefeng XieSchool of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China xiexuefeng@ahmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1913-9590
Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the incidence and types of medication errors occurring during the transfer of patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the non-ICU setting and explore the key factors affecting medication safety in transfer care.

designMulticentre, retrospective, epidemiological study.

participantsPatients transferred from the ICU to a non-ICU setting between 1 July 2019 and 30 June 2020.

main outcome measuresIncidence and types of medication errors.

resultsOf the 1546 patients transferred during the study period, 899 (58.15%) had at least one medication error. Most errors (83.00%) were National Coordinating Council (NCC) for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (MERP) category C. A small number of errors (17.00%) were category D. Among patients with medication errors, there was an average of 1.68 (SD, 0.90; range, 1-5) errors per patient. The most common types of errors were route of administration 570 (37.85%), dosage 271 (17.99%) and frequency 139 (9.23%). Eighty-three per cent of medication errors reached patients but did not cause harm. Daytime ICU transfer (07:00-14:59) and an admission diagnosis of severe kidney disease were found to be factors associated with the occurrence of medication errors as compared with the reference category (OR, 1.40; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.95; OR, 6.78; 95% CI 1.46 to 31.60, respectively).Orders for bronchorespiratory (OR, 5.92; 95% CI 4.2 to 8.32), cardiovascular (OR, 1.91; 95% CI 1.34 to 2.73), hepatic (OR, 1.95; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.91), endocrine (OR, 1.99; 95% CI 1.37 to 2.91), haematologic (OR, 2.58; 95% CI 1.84 to 3.64), anti-inflammatory/pain (OR, 2.80; 95% CI 1.90 to 4.12) and vitamin (OR, 1.73; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.37) medications at transition of care were associated with an increased odds of medication error.

conclusionsMore than half of ICU patients experienced medication errors during the transition of care. The vast majority of medication errors reached the patient but did not cause harm.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatient TransferCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMedication ErrorsRetrospective Studiesadult intensive & critical careepidemiologyhealth & safetyrisk management

Identifiers

PMID35428614
PMCPMC9013992
OpenAlexW4223928319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.