Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428372›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2022

Environmental and anthropogenic influences on movement and foraging in a critically endangered lemur species, Propithecus tattersalli: implications for habitat conservation planning.

Meredith A Semel, Heather N Abernathy, Brandon P Semel, Michael J Cherry, Tsioriniaina J C Ratovoson, Ignacio T Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meredith A SemelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. merak91@vt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4317-8602
Heather N AbernathyDepartment of Fish & Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Brandon P SemelDepartment of Fish & Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-0382
Michael J CherryCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, 78363, USA.
Tsioriniaina J C RatovosonDépartement Zoologie et Biodiversité Animale, Université d'Antananarivo, 566 Analamanga, 101, Antananarivo, BP, Madagascar.
Ignacio T MooreDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-8913
Virginia Tech · USTexas A&M University – Kingsville · USUniversity of Antananarivo · MG

Funding

Rufford Foundation 78c6a2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWildlife conservation often focuses on establishing protected areas. However, these conservation zones are frequently established without adequate knowledge of the movement patterns of the species they are designed to protect. Understanding movement and foraging patterns of species in dynamic and diverse habitats can allow managers to develop more effective conservation plans. Threatened lemurs in Madagascar are an example where management plans and protected areas are typically created to encompass large, extant forests rather than consider the overall resource needs of the target species.

methodsTo gain an understanding of golden-crowned sifaka (Propithecus tattersalli) movement patterns, including space use and habitat selection across their range of inhabited forest types, we combined behavior data with Dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models and Resource Selection Functions. We also examined the influence of abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic factors on home range size, movement rates, and foraging patterns.

resultsWe found that home range size and movement rates differed between seasons, with increased core area size and movement in the rainy season. Forest type also played a role in foraging behavior with sifaka groups in the humid forest avoiding roads in both seasons, groups in the dry deciduous forest avoiding road networks in the rainy season, and groups in the moderate evergreen forest displaying no selection or avoidance of road networks while foraging.

conclusionOur study illustrates the importance of studying primate groups across seasons and forest types, as developing conservation plans from a single snapshot can give an inaccurate assessment of their natural behavior and resources needs of the species. More specifically, by understanding how forest type influences golden-crowned sifaka movement and foraging behavior, conservation management plans can be made to the individual forest types inhabited (dry deciduous, moderate evergreen, humid, littoral, etc.), rather than the region as a whole.

Indexed as

Brownian bridge modelingForagingHome rangeLemursMovementPrimatesResource selectionRoad avoidanceSpace use

Identifiers

PMID35428372
PMCPMC9013159
OpenAlexW4225815130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.