ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2022
Sex difference in frontal plane hip moment in response to lateral trunk obliquity during single-leg landing.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Force during Single-leg Landing Using Two-dimensional Video Images and Pose Estimation Artificial Intelligence.Physical therapy research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLateral trunk obliquity during landing is a characteristic of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in female athletes and affects their knee and hip kinetics and kinematics. However, it is unclear whether these effects differ between females and males. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of lateral trunk obliquity on knee and hip kinetics and kinematics in females and males during single-leg landing.
methodsEighteen female (aged 22.1 ± 1.5 years) and 18 male participants (aged 21.8 ± 1.1 years) performed single-leg landings under two conditions: (1) without any instructions about trunk position (natural) and (2) with leaning their trunks laterally 15° from the vertical line (trunk obliquity). The kinetics and kinematics of their hip and knee were analyzed using a three-dimensional motion analysis with a force plate. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (sex × trunk obliquity) and Bonferroni pairwise comparisons were conducted.
resultsThe trunk obliquity angle at initial contact was significantly greater in the trunk-obliquity landing condition than in the natural landing condition (natural 4.0 ± 2.2°, trunk-obliquity 15.1 ± 3.6°, P < 0.001) with no sex difference (95% CI - 1.2 to 2.2°, P = 0.555). The peak knee abduction moment was significantly larger in the trunk-obliquity landing condition than in the natural landing condition (trunk-obliquity, 0.09 ± 0.07 Nm/kg/m; natural, 0.04 ± 0.06 Nm/kg/m; P < 0.001), though there was no sex or interaction effect. A significant interaction between sex and landing condition was found for the peak hip abduction moment (P = 0.021). Males showed a significantly larger peak hip abduction moment in the trunk-obliquity landing condition than in the natural landing condition (95% CI 0.05 to 0.13 Nm/kg/m, P < 0.001), while females showed no difference in the peak hip abduction moment between the two landing conditions (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.06 Nm/kg/m, P = 0.355).
conclusionsThe knee abduction moment increased with a laterally inclined trunk for both female and male participants, while the hip abduction moment increased in males but not in females. It may be beneficial for females to focus on frontal plane hip joint control under lateral trunk-obliquity conditions during single-leg landing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.