Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428328›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

Examination of three-factor eating questionnaire subscale scores on weight loss and weight loss maintenance in a clinical intervention.

Natalie M Papini, Rachel N S Foster, Nanette V Lopez, Lauren T Ptomey, Stephen D Herrmann, Joseph E Donnelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie M PapiniDepartment of Health Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 1100 S. Beaver St., Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA. Natalie.Papini@nau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-6154
Rachel N S FosterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Physical Activity and Weight Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Nanette V LopezDepartment of Health Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 1100 S. Beaver St., Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA.
Lauren T PtomeyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Physical Activity and Weight Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Stephen D HerrmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Physical Activity and Weight Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Joseph E DonnellyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Physical Activity and Weight Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USNorthern Arizona University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to examine three-factor eating questionnaire (TFEQ) scores at baseline and post-intervention (6 months) on successful weight loss and weight maintenance in an 18-month behavioral weight management intervention for adults with overweight and obesity.

methodsTFEQ and weight were assessed at baseline, 6, and 18 months. Logistic regression models were used to examine scores at baseline on disinhibition, restraint, and perceived hunger factors in the TFEQ on 5% body weight loss at 6 months and 6-month scores to predict 5% weight maintenance at 18 months while controlling for age, sex, and baseline weight.

resultsParticipants (n = 287; age = 43.8 ± 10.36 years; female = 64.1%; weight = 222.5 ± 39.02 pounds; BMI = 34.73 ± 4.56) were included for analysis. Dietary restraint at baseline was the only significant predictor of 5% weight loss at 6 months. None of the TFEQ subscale scores at 6 months predicted 5% weight maintenance at 18 months. The model examining weight loss at 6 months accounted for 7% of the variance of the outcome and 11% of the variance of weight maintenance at 18 months.

conclusionDietary restraint is a unique eating behavior associated with weight loss at 6 months beyond other eating behaviors measured by the TFEQ in an adult sample enrolled in a weight loss intervention. No other subscale scores were significant at 6 months or at 18 months. Future research should consider how to promote flexible control and discourage adoption of rigid restraint behaviors since the latter is associated with disordered eating patterns.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorWeight LossAdultFemaleHumansHungerMiddle AgedObesitySurveys and QuestionnairesDisinhibitionEating behaviorsHungerRestraint

Identifiers

PMID35428328
PMCPMC9013121
OpenAlexW4223933224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.