Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428301›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Development of a portable hypoxia chamber for ultra-high dose rate laser-driven proton radiobiology applications.

Pankaj Chaudhary, Deborah C Gwynne, Boris Odlozilik, Aaron McMurray, Giuliana Milluzzo, Carla Maiorino, Domenico Doria, Hamad Ahmed, Lorenzo Romagnani, Aaron Alejo and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emerging technologies for cancer therapy using accelerated particles.Progress in particle and nuclear physics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Pankaj ChaudharyThe Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK. p.chaudhary@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-3635
Deborah C GwynneCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Boris OdlozilikCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Aaron McMurrayCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Giuliana MilluzzoCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Carla MaiorinoThe Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK.
Domenico DoriaCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Hamad AhmedCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Lorenzo RomagnaniLaboratoire LULI, École Polytechnique, Route de Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, Paris, France.
Aaron AlejoCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Hersimerjit PaddaDepartment of Physics, SUPA, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
James GreenExperimental Science Group, Central Laser Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxford, OX11 0QX, England, UK.
David CarrollExperimental Science Group, Central Laser Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxford, OX11 0QX, England, UK.
Nicola BoothExperimental Science Group, Central Laser Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxford, OX11 0QX, England, UK.
Paul McKennaDepartment of Physics, SUPA, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
Satyabrata KarCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Giada PetringaLaboratori Nazionali del Sud - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via S Sofia 62, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Roberto CatalanoLaboratori Nazionali del Sud - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via S Sofia 62, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Francesco P CammarataLaboratori Nazionali del Sud - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via S Sofia 62, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe A P CirroneLaboratori Nazionali del Sud - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via S Sofia 62, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Stephen J McMahonThe Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK.
Kevin M PriseThe Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK. k.prise@qub.ac.uk.
Marco BorghesiCentre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK. M.Borghesi@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GBIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare · ITRutherford Appleton Laboratory · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GBÉcole Polytechnique · FR

Funding

engineering and physical sciences research council EPJ500094/1engineering and physical sciences research council EP/K022415/1engineering and physical sciences research council EP/P010059/1european metrology programme for innovation and research 18HLT04 UHDhorizon 2020 framework programme European Union's Horizon 2020 researchhorizon 2020 framework programme innovation program under the Marie Sklowdowska-Curie grant agreement no 754507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is currently significant interest in assessing the role of oxygen in the radiobiological effects at ultra-high dose rates. Oxygen modulation is postulated to play a role in the enhanced sparing effect observed in FLASH radiotherapy, where particles are delivered at 40-1000 Gy/s. Furthermore, the development of laser-driven accelerators now enables radiobiology experiments in extreme regimes where dose rates can exceed 10 MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used oxygen concentration measurements to test the induction of hypoxia and the maintenance capacity of the chambers. Cellular hypoxia induction was verified using hypoxia inducible factor-1α immunostaining. Calibrated radiochromic films and GEANT-4 simulations verified the dosimetry variations inside and outside the chambers. We irradiated hypoxic human skin fibroblasts (AG01522B) cells with laser-driven protons, conventional protons and reference 225 kVp X-rays to quantify DNA DSB damage and repair under hypoxia. We further measured the oxygen enhancement ratio for cell survival after X-ray exposure in normal fibroblast and radioresistant patient- derived GBM stem cells.

resultsOxygen measurements showed that our chambers maintained a radiobiological hypoxic environment for at least 45 min and pathological hypoxia for up to 24 h after disconnecting the chambers from the gas supply. We observed a significant reduction in the 53BP1 foci induced by laser-driven protons, conventional protons and X-rays in the hypoxic cells compared to normoxic cells at 30 min post-irradiation. Under hypoxic irradiations, the Laser-driven protons induced significant residual DNA DSB damage in hypoxic AG01522B cells compared to the conventional dose rate protons suggesting an important impact of these extremely high dose-rate exposures. We obtained an oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) of 2.1 ± 0.1 and 2.5 ± 0.1 respectively for the AG01522B and patient-derived GBM stem cells for X-ray irradiation using our hypoxia chambers.

conclusionWe demonstrated the design and application of portable hypoxia chambers for studying cellular radiobiological endpoints after exposure to laser-driven protons at ultra-high dose, conventional protons and X-rays. Suitable levels of reduced oxygen concentration could be maintained in the absence of external gassing to quantify hypoxic effects. The data obtained provided indication of an enhanced residual DNA DSB damage under hypoxic conditions at ultra-high dose rate compared to the conventional protons or X-rays.

Indexed as

ProtonsRadiobiologyDNAHumansHypoxiaLasersOxygenDNAOxygenProtonsDNA repairHypoxiaLaser-driven protonsUltra-high dose rate

Identifiers

PMID35428301
PMCPMC9013042
OpenAlexW4226438794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.