Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428291›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

A pattern-discovery-based outcome predictive tool integrated with clinical data repository: design and a case study on contrast related acute kidney injury.

Yuxi Li, Tak-Ming Chan, Jinghan Feng, Liang Tao, Jie Jiang, Bo Zheng, Yong Huo, Jianping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuxi Li *Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St., Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Tak-Ming Chan *Digital Innovation Department, WuXi AppTec, Shanghai, China.
Jinghan FengBI X Digital Lab, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shanghai, China.
Liang TaoBig Data and AI of Philips Research China, Shanghai, China.
Jie JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St., Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Bo ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St., Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yong HuoDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St., Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Jianping LiDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St., Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. lijianping03455@pkufh.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical data repositories (CDR) including electronic health record (EHR) data have great potential for outcome prediction and risk modeling. We built a prediction tool integrated with CDR based on pattern discovery and demonstrated a case study on contrast related acute kidney injury (AKI).

methodsPatients undergoing cardiac catheterization from January 2015 to April 2017 were included. AKI was identified based on Acute Kidney Injury Network definition. Predictive model including 16 variables covered in existing AKI models was built. A visual analytics tool based on pattern discovery was trained on 70% data up to August 2016 with three interactive knowledge incorporation modes to develop 3 models: (1) pure data-driven, (2) domain knowledge, and (3) clinician-interactive, which were tested and compared on 30% consecutive cases dated afterwards.

resultsAmong 2560 patients in the final dataset, 189 (7.3%) had AKI. We measured 4 existing models, whose areas under curves (AUCs) of receiver operating characteristics curve for the test dataset were 0.70 (Mehran's), 0.72 (Chen's), 0.67 (Gao's) and 0.62 (AGEF), respectively. A pure data-driven machine learning method achieves AUC of 0.72 (Easy Ensemble). The AUCs of our 3 models are 0.77, 0.80, 0.82, respectively, with the last being top where physician knowledge is incorporated.

conclusionsWe developed a novel pattern-discovery-based outcome prediction tool integrated with CDR and purely using EHR data. On the case of predicting contrast related AKI, the tool showed user-friendliness by physicians, and demonstrated a competitive performance in comparison with the state-of-the-art models.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveAcute kidney injuryMachine learningPattern discoveryPredictive tool

Identifiers

PMID35428291
PMCPMC9013021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.