Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428270›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2022

Corticomedullary shunting after ischaemia and reperfusion in the porcine kidney?

Michael Rehling, Stine Gram Skjøth, Jørgen Frøkiær, Lene Elsebeth Nielsen, Christian Flø, Bente Jespersen, Anna Krarup Keller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael RehlingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, PET-Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stine Gram SkjøthDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, PET-Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jørgen FrøkiærDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, PET-Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lene Elsebeth NielsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, PET-Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christian FløDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, PET-Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bente JespersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anna Krarup KellerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. anna.keller@clin.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9109-5521
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal perfusion may redistribute from cortex to medulla during systemic hypovolaemia and after renal ischaemia for other reasons, but there is no consensus on this matter. We studied renal perfusion after renal ischaemia and reperfusion.

methodsRenal perfusion distribution was examined by use of

resultsVisual evaluation after reperfusion demonstrated that MS redistributed from the renal cortex to the medulla in 6 out of 16 pigs (38%) subjected to 4 h ischaemia and in one out of 18 pigs subjected to 2 h ischaemia. Central renal uptake of MS covering the medullary/total renal uptake was significantly higher in kidneys subjected to 4 h ischaemia compared with pigs subjected to 2 h ischaemia (69 ± 5% vs. 63 ± 1%, p < 0.001), and also significantly higher than in the contralateral kidney (69 ± 5% vs. 63 ± 2%, p < 0.001). Analysis of blood and urine demonstrated no presence of radioactivity.

conclusionThe study demonstrated the presence of MS in the renal medulla in response to renal ischaemia and reperfusion suggesting that severe ischaemia and reperfusion of the pig kidney leads to opening of functional shunts bypassing glomeruli.

Indexed as

Reperfusion InjuryAnimalsHumansIschemiaKidneyKidney MedullaReperfusionSwineMicrospheresRenal blood flowRenal ischaemiaRenal perfusionRenal redistributionRenal shunts

Identifiers

PMID35428270
PMCPMC9013123
OpenAlexW4225598888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.