Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428263›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2022

Early and strong antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 predict disease severity in COVID-19 patients.

Jānis Plūme, Artis Galvanovskis, Sindija Šmite, Nadezhda Romanchikova, Pawel Zayakin, Aija Linē

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HLA-E-restricted SARS-CoV-2 epitopes drive CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibody-dependent enhancement of coronaviruses.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Identifying patients at risk of anaphylaxis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jānis PlūmeCancer Biomarker Group, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str 1, k-1, Riga, 1067, Latvia.
Artis GalvanovskisCancer Biomarker Group, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str 1, k-1, Riga, 1067, Latvia.
Sindija ŠmiteCancer Biomarker Group, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str 1, k-1, Riga, 1067, Latvia.
Nadezhda RomanchikovaCancer Biomarker Group, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str 1, k-1, Riga, 1067, Latvia.
Pawel ZayakinCancer Biomarker Group, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str 1, k-1, Riga, 1067, Latvia.
Aija LinēCancer Biomarker Group, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str 1, k-1, Riga, 1067, Latvia. aija@biomed.lu.lv.ORCID 0000-0002-8492-4758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibody response to SARS-CoV-2 is a valuable biomarker for the assessment of the spread of the virus in a population and evaluation of the vaccine candidates. Recent data suggest that antibody levels also may have a prognostic significance in COVID-19. Most of the serological studies so far rely on testing antibodies against spike (S) or nucleocapsid (N) protein, however antibodies can be directed against other structural and nonstructural proteins of the virus, whereas their frequency, biological and clinical significance is unknown.

methodsA novel antigen array comprising 30 SARS-CoV-2 antigens or their fragments was developed and used to examine IgG, IgA, IgE and IgM responses to SARS-CoV-2 in sera from 103 patients with COVID-19 including 34 patients for whom sequential samples were available, and 20 pre-pandemic healthy controls.

resultsAntibody responses to various antigens are highly correlated and the frequencies and peak levels of antibodies are higher in patients with severe/moderate disease than in those with mild disease. This finding supports the idea that antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 may exacerbate the severity of the disease via antibody-dependent enhancement. Moreover, early IgG and IgA responses to full length S protein may be used as an additional biomarker for the identification of patients who are at risk of developing severe disease. Importantly, this is the first study reporting that SARS-CoV-2 elicits IgE responses and their serum levels positively correlate with the severity of the disease thus suggesting a link between high levels of antibodies and mast cell activation.

conclusionsThis is the first study assessing the prevalence and dynamics IgG, IgA, IgE and IgM responses to multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens simultaneously. Results provide important insights into the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and have implications in planning and interpreting antibody-based epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralAntibody FormationBiomarkersHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, ViralBiomarkersImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MAntibody profileAntigen microarrayIgAIgEIgGMast cellsPrognosisSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35428263
PMCPMC9012069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.