Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428204›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2022

Efficacy of modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach in open gynecological surgery: a prospective observational pilot study and a cadaveric evaluation.

Nobuhiro Tanaka, Takanori Suzuka, Yuma Kadoya, Naoko Okamoto, Mariko Sato, Hideaki Kawanishi, Cho Azuma, Mayumi Nishi, Masahiko Kawaguchi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nobuhiro TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan. nobuhirotanaka@naramed-u.ac.jp.
Takanori SuzukaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Yuma KadoyaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Naoko OkamotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Mariko SatoTakatsuki General Hospital, 1-3-13, Kosobe-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1192, Japan.
Hideaki KawanishiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Cho AzumaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Mayumi NishiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Masahiko KawaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) was first described as a peripheral nerve block by Tulgar in 2019. This technique provides an analgesic effective range from Th7-11 with a single puncture per side. Although the efficacy and effective duration of M-TAPA have been reported, further examination is required. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the analgesic range and effective duration of M-TAPA in open gynecologic surgery.

methodsFollowing approval, 10 adult female patients scheduled for open radical hysterectomy via a vertical incision or laparotomy using a midline incision from under the xiphoid process to the symphysis pubis were enrolled. The primary outcome was the number of anesthetized dermatomes at 2 and 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included numerical rating scale scores and the total amount of fentanyl used. Cadaveric evaluation was performed to assess the spread of the dye.

resultsThe median numbers (interquartile range) of anesthetized dermatomes at 2 and 24 h postoperatively were 6 (5-7) and 6.5 (5-7) in the anterior cutaneous branch area and 5 (4-7) and 7 (5-7) in the lateral cutaneous branch area, respectively. There was an 85% chance of simultaneously acquiring analgesia in areas innervated by Th8-11, including complete block in areas innervated by the anterior cutaneous branches of Th9-10. Cadaveric evaluation showed the spread of the dye in Th8-11.

conclusionsM-TAPA may have analgesic effects in the areas supplied by the anterior cutaneous branches of Th8-11. TRAIL REGISTRATION: IRB approval (No.2700; registered on July 10, 2020) and registration (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000041137 ; registered on July 17, 2020).

Indexed as

AnalgesicsPostoperative PainAdultCadaverFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesicsAnalgesiaGynecological surgeryModified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach; M-TAPAPeripheral nerve block

Identifiers

PMID35428204
PMCPMC9010447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.