Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35428192›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

DualGCN: a dual graph convolutional network model to predict cancer drug response.

Tianxing Ma, Qiao Liu, Haochen Li, Mu Zhou, Rui Jiang, Xuegong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Drug Sensitivity Prediction Based on Multi-stage Multi-modal Drug Representation Learning.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drug response in the era of precision medicine: A methodological review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  14. Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianxing MaMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Bioinformatics Division, BNRIST and Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Qiao LiuDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Haochen LiSchool of Medicine, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Mu ZhouSenseBrain Research, San Jose, CA, 95131, USA.
Rui JiangMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Bioinformatics Division, BNRIST and Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Xuegong ZhangMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Bioinformatics Division, BNRIST and Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. zhangxg@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9684-5643

Funding

NSFC 61721003NSFC 62050178Tsinghua-Fuzhou Institute for Data Technology grant TFIDT2021005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug resistance is a critical obstacle in cancer therapy. Discovering cancer drug response is important to improve anti-cancer drug treatment and guide anti-cancer drug design. Abundant genomic and drug response resources of cancer cell lines provide unprecedented opportunities for such study. However, cancer cell lines cannot fully reflect heterogeneous tumor microenvironments. Transferring knowledge studied from in vitro cell lines to single-cell and clinical data will be a promising direction to better understand drug resistance. Most current studies include single nucleotide variants (SNV) as features and focus on improving predictive ability of cancer drug response on cell lines. However, obtaining accurate SNVs from clinical tumor samples and single-cell data is not reliable. This makes it difficult to generalize such SNV-based models to clinical tumor data or single-cell level studies in the future.

resultsWe present a new method, DualGCN, a unified Dual Graph Convolutional Network model to predict cancer drug response. DualGCN encodes both chemical structures of drugs and omics data of biological samples using graph convolutional networks. Then the two embeddings are fed into a multilayer perceptron to predict drug response. DualGCN incorporates prior knowledge on cancer-related genes and protein-protein interactions, and outperforms most state-of-the-art methods while avoiding using large-scale SNV data.

conclusionsThe proposed method outperforms most state-of-the-art methods in predicting cancer drug response without the use of large-scale SNV data. These favorable results indicate its potential to be extended to clinical and single-cell tumor samples and advancements in precision medicine.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsGenomicsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsCancer drug responseGraph convolutional networksProtein–protein interactionsTumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID35428192
PMCPMC9011932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.