ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
Answering medical questions in Chinese using automatically mined knowledge and deep neural networks: an end-to-end solution.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recognition of Chinese Electronic Medical Records for Rehabilitation Robots: Information Fusion Classification Strategy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Intermediate-Risk and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Recognition and Management: Cardiology Clinics: Cardiac Emergencies.Cardiology clinics · 2024Review
- Year 2022 in Medical Natural Language Processing: Availability of Language Models as a Step in the Democratization of NLP in the Biomedical Area.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- SADLN: Self-attention based deep learning network of integrating multi-omics data for cancer subtype recognition.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical information has rapidly increased on the internet and has become one of the main targets of search engine use. However, medical information on the internet is subject to the problems of quality and accessibility, so ordinary users are unable to obtain answers to their medical questions conveniently. As a solution, researchers build medical question answering (QA) systems. However, research on medical QA in the Chinese language lags behind work on English-based systems. This lag is mainly due to the difficulty of constructing a high-quality knowledge base and the underutilization of medical corpora in the Chinese language.
resultsThis study developed an end-to-end solution to implement a medical QA system for the Chinese language with low cost and time. First, we created a high-quality medical knowledge graph from hospital data (electronic health/medical records) in a nearly automatic manner that trained a supervised model based on data labeled using bootstrapping techniques. Then, we designed a QA system based on a memory-based neural network and attention mechanism. Finally, we trained the system to generate answers from the knowledge base and a QA corpus on the internet.
conclusionsBootstrapping and deep neural network techniques can construct a knowledge graph from electronic health/medical records with satisfactory precision and coverage. Our proposed context bridge mechanisms perform training with a variety of language features. Our QA system can achieve state-of-the-art quality in answering medical questions with constrained topics. As we evaluated, complex Chinese language processing techniques, such as segmentation and parsing, were not necessary for practice and complex architectures were not necessary to build the QA system. Lastly, we created an application using our method for internet QA usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.