Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35427410›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2022

Fertility Preservation Discussions Between Young Adult Rectal Cancer Survivors and Their Providers: Sex-Specific Prevalence and Correlates.

Julia Stal, Serena Y Yi, Sally Cohen-Cutler, Phuong Gallagher, Afsaneh Barzi, David R Freyer, Joel E Milam, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Kimberly A Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Sexual Dysfunction after Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Future of Treatment of Adolescents and Young Adults With ALL: A Vision for Collaboration and Equity.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. "It's Probably Just Hemorrhoids": A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Long-term Survivors of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Fertility preservation in reproductive-aged female patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Cancer Treatment-Related Ovarian Dysfunction in Women of Childbearing Potential: Management and Fertility Preservation Options.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Oncofertility in pediatric patients: current perspectives.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Julia StalDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-7388
Serena Y YiDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sally Cohen-CutlerCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Phuong GallagherThe Colon Club, USA.
Afsaneh BarziDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
David R FreyerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-990X
Joel E MilamSchool of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Heinz-Josef LenzDivision of Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kimberly A MillerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Southern California · USKeck Hospital of USC · USArmy and Navy Club · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung adults (YA) diagnosed with rectal cancer are disproportionately impacted by the gonadotoxic effects of treatment and potential subsequent infertility.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence of fertility preservation measures used, reasons why such measures were not used, and correlates of discussion between providers and YA rectal cancer survivors.

designAn online, cross-sectional survey was administered on the Facebook page of a national colorectal cancer (CRC) advocacy organization. Eligible participants were rectal cancer survivors diagnosed before age 50, between 6 and 36 months from diagnosis or relapse, and based in the US.

resultsParticipants were 148 rectal cancer survivors. Over half of the survivors reported that their doctor did not talk to them about potential therapy-related fertility complications. Only one-fifth of survivors banked sperm (males) or eggs/embryos (females) prior to their cancer therapy. Older age at diagnosis and greater quality of life were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussions among males. Greater quality of life was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussion among females.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that the majority of YA rectal cancer survivors do not receive, or cannot recall, comprehensive cancer care, and help to identify patients with rectal cancer who may be at risk for inadequate fertility counseling. Clinicians should provide proper counseling to mitigate this late effect and to ensure optimal quality of life for YA rectal cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFertility PreservationNeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrevalenceQuality of LifeRare DiseasesSemenSurvivorsYoung Adultcancerfertilityrectal cancerreproductive healthsurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35427410
PMCPMC9255970
OpenAlexW4213423119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.