Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35427384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in cancer patients.

Minichil Worku, Gizeaddis Belay, Abiye Tigabu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Infections withJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phylogenetic analysis ofOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotic Resistance Profile ofBioMed research international · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minichil WorkuDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Gizeaddis BelayDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Abiye TigabuDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-4160-1094
University of Gondar · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBloodstream infections have been the leading complications in cancer patients because they are at high risk for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. There is increasing evidence from different parts of the world of the high prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial strains in cancer patients. The burden of the infection is high in developing countries, especially in Ethiopia. Data on bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among cancer patients in Ethiopia is limited. Thus, this study aimed to determine the predominant bacterial species causing bacteremia and their antibiotic resistance pattern among cancer patients at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital.

methodsA hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 study participants from March to July 2021. All cancer patients who developed a fever at the time of hospital visit were included in this study, and their socio-demographic and clinical data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Blood samples (10 mL for adults and 4 mL for children) were collected from each patient, and the collected blood samples were transferred into sterile tryptic soy broth, then incubated at 37°C for 7 days. Tryptic soy broth which showed signs of growth were Gram-stained and sub-cultured on blood agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, and mannitol salt agar. The inoculated plates were then aerobically incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours and the isolates obtained were identified using standard microbiological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done using a modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique following CLSI 2021 guidelines. Data were entered using EPI data version 4.6 and analyzed with SPSS version 20.

resultsIn this study, out of 200 cancer patients included and 67.5% (135/200) of them were males. The majorities of study participants, 56% (113/200) of cancer patients were pediatrics and 26.5% (53/200) of them belong under five years of age. Out of 200 patient samples that had undergone culture, 27% (54/200) samples had bacterial growth. Gram-positive bacterial isolates were predominant, 61.1%, and S. aureus was the predominant Gram-positive isolate, (51.5.6%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (48.5%). Moreover, K. pneumoniae (47%) and P. aeruginosa (29.5%) were the most common Gram-negative bacterial isolates. Among patients who had BSIs, the highest prevalence of BSIs was observed among males (66.7%), and in pediatrics cancer patients (44.2%). Pediatric study participants were more venerable to bloodstream infection (P = 0.000) compared to adult participants. Meropenem (100%), amikacin (100%), piperacillin/tazobactam (72.3%), and ceftazidime (73.5%) were effective against for Gram-negative isolates while cefoxitin (81.2%) and penicillin (70.5%) were effective for Gram-positive isolates. Additionally, most Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial isolates were sensitive for gentamycin (75.9%). Multidrug resistance was seen among 17.1% bacterial isolates, and MDR in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were 83.3% and 16.7%, respectively. Gram-negative bacterial isolates showed a high prevalence of MDR than Gram-positive isolates. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: BSI's remains an important health problem in cancer patients, and Gram-positive bacteria were more common as etiologic agents of BSIs in cancer patients. S. aureus was the dominant bacteria followed by CoNS, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Multidrug-resistant isolates found in cancer patients and routine bacterial surveillance and study of their resistance patterns may guide successful antimicrobial therapy and improve the quality of care. Therefore, strict regulation of antibiotic stewardship and infection control programs should be considered in the study area.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSepsisAdultAgarAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChildCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEthiopiaFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAgarAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35427384
PMCPMC9012398
OpenAlexW4223936888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.